nanogui: New Microwindows font support


Previous by date: 21 Mar 2000 19:18:50 -0000 Re: New Microwindows font support, Roberto Alsina
Next by date: 21 Mar 2000 19:18:50 -0000 Re: OT TROLL: Re: What is the status of porting Opera to MicroWindows ?, Alex Holden
Previous in thread: 21 Mar 2000 19:18:50 -0000 Re: New Microwindows font support, Roberto Alsina
Next in thread: 21 Mar 2000 19:18:50 -0000 Re: New Microwindows font support, vidar.hokstad.com

Subject: Re: New Microwindows font support
From: Rob Leslie ####@####.####
Date: 21 Mar 2000 19:18:50 -0000
Message-Id: <200003211908.OAA03471@deimos.mars.org>

>> The Unicode standard defines character codes U+D800 through U+DFFF to be
>> "surrogates," such that a pair made up from one high-half surrogate (U+D800
>> - U+DBFF) and one low-half surrogate (U+DC00 - U+DFFF) represents a single
>> abstract character with a scalar value defined to be:
>> 
>>   0x10000 + (H - 0xD800) * 0x400 + (L - 0xDC00)
> 
> Oh, my goodness. Does it have any practical current use, or can we just
> forget about this thing and live blissfully ignorant of it? :-)

I haven't looked at the version 3.0 standard, but as of version 2.1 none of
these abstract characters were assigned.

Surrogates can probably safely be ignored, although a good implementation
might at least try to recognize (H,L) pairs and treat them as a single unit
for display purposes.

-- 
Robert Leslie
####@####.####

Previous by date: 21 Mar 2000 19:18:50 -0000 Re: New Microwindows font support, Roberto Alsina
Next by date: 21 Mar 2000 19:18:50 -0000 Re: OT TROLL: Re: What is the status of porting Opera to MicroWindows ?, Alex Holden
Previous in thread: 21 Mar 2000 19:18:50 -0000 Re: New Microwindows font support, Roberto Alsina
Next in thread: 21 Mar 2000 19:18:50 -0000 Re: New Microwindows font support, vidar.hokstad.com


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.