nanogui: X v.s. Nano-X in embedded systems
Subject:
X v.s. Nano-X in embedded systems
From:
Murphy Chen ####@####.####
Date:
9 May 2000 10:36:05 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10005091825390.22102-100000@pc120105.ccl.itri.org.tw>
Hello,
My group is arguing about using X or Nano-X in embedded systems.
Say, the target is a electronic book running Linux.
For me, X is big and hard to adapt.
But it has a lot of resources like widgets, ready applications.
On the contrary, Nano-X is small and flexible.
But it needs some effor for porting existed applications.
BTW, how fast is Nano-X, as compared to frame-buffered X?
I'd like to hear any kind of comments from you.
( For now, I prefer Nano-X for embedded systms. :)
-------------------------------------------------------
Murphy Chen (陳正哲) ####@####.####
Design Engineer, Internet Embedded System Department
Computer & Communications Research Laboratories
Industrial Technology Research Institute, Taiwan
