nanogui: Bitblt proposal (was: Re: bogl routines)


Previous by date: 18 May 1999 02:11:49 -0000 Re: David Bell, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 18 May 1999 02:11:49 -0000 Re: What needs doing on Nano-X, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 18 May 1999 02:11:49 -0000 Bitblt proposal (was: Re: bogl routines), Ben Pfaff
Next in thread: 18 May 1999 02:11:49 -0000 Re: Bitblt proposal (was: Re: bogl routines), Greg Haerr

Subject: Re: Bitblt proposal (was: Re: bogl routines)
From: Ben Pfaff ####@####.####
Date: 18 May 1999 02:11:49 -0000
Message-Id: <87lnent98d.fsf@pfaffben.user.msu.edu>

Ben Pfaff ####@####.#### writes:
   [...bitblt proposal...]

I haven't seen any replies on this.  Either that means that my email
is screwed up again, or no one made any comments.

Should I take this as initial assent to my proposal?  If so, then I'll
get started on it sometime this week, probably implementing vga16 and
cfb8 as a test case.

Previous by date: 18 May 1999 02:11:49 -0000 Re: David Bell, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 18 May 1999 02:11:49 -0000 Re: What needs doing on Nano-X, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 18 May 1999 02:11:49 -0000 Bitblt proposal (was: Re: bogl routines), Ben Pfaff
Next in thread: 18 May 1999 02:11:49 -0000 Re: Bitblt proposal (was: Re: bogl routines), Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.