| Previous by date: | 20 Dec 2014 20:27:29 -0000 Re:Specifying processor header file in Makefile/commandline with gpasm in --mpasm-compatible mode, Joe Pfeiffer |
| Next by date: | 20 Dec 2014 20:27:29 -0000 Re: Specifying processor header file in Makefile/commandline with gpasm in --mpasm-compatible mode, Kustaa Nyholm |
| Previous in thread: | 20 Dec 2014 20:27:29 -0000 Re: Specifying processor header file in Makefile/commandline with gpasm in --mpasm-compatible mode, Vikas N Kumar |
| Next in thread: | 20 Dec 2014 20:27:29 -0000 Re: Specifying processor header file in Makefile/commandline with gpasm in --mpasm-compatible mode, Kustaa Nyholm |
On 20/12/2014 18:19, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: > I use a processor directive in my source file instead of the -p > option. This would let you define a symbol on the command line, and > then reference the symbol both in the processor directive and in the > include statement. > Right, I thought about this, for some reason MPLAB manual says that this is not usually done. Why not I wonder because to me it looks totally acceptable. Thanks for the confirmation that this is ok. br Kusti
| Previous by date: | 20 Dec 2014 20:27:29 -0000 Re:Specifying processor header file in Makefile/commandline with gpasm in --mpasm-compatible mode, Joe Pfeiffer |
| Next by date: | 20 Dec 2014 20:27:29 -0000 Re: Specifying processor header file in Makefile/commandline with gpasm in --mpasm-compatible mode, Kustaa Nyholm |
| Previous in thread: | 20 Dec 2014 20:27:29 -0000 Re: Specifying processor header file in Makefile/commandline with gpasm in --mpasm-compatible mode, Vikas N Kumar |
| Next in thread: | 20 Dec 2014 20:27:29 -0000 Re: Specifying processor header file in Makefile/commandline with gpasm in --mpasm-compatible mode, Kustaa Nyholm |