[<<] [<] Page 1 of 2 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Plustek driver
From: "Anthony Amaro Jr." ####@####.#### Date: 9 Jun 2000 15:16:07 -0000 Message-Id: <39410B01.CE034CBB@mail.utexas.edu> I have a similar situation with loading the printer driver. Here is the error message I get after typing the command "make -f MakeKernel load": make[1]: Entering directory `/public/sane-1.0.1/backend/plustek_driver' /sbin/modprobe pt_drv || exit 1 /lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_memcpy /lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_memset /lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_copy_to_user /lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_copy_from_user /lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o failed /lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_memcpy /lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_memset /lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_copy_to_user /lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_copy_from_user /lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: insmod /lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o failed /lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: insmod pt_drv failed make[1]: *** [load] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/public/sane-1.0.1/backend/plustek_driver' make: *** [load] Error 2 I followed the installation steps verbatim, but it doesn't seem to want to load the pt_drv module. But then I run the "plustek_scan" program and it makes the scanner light turn on and locks up when it says it is scanning. Here is my setup: AMD K6III-450 IWILL 100+ Motherboard Quantum Bigfoot 8.4GB HD, IDE 2 ATAPI CD-ROMS, 24x no SCSI devices, although using SCSI emulation to get the CD-ROMS to work HP Deskjet 712C printer, connected to 4830P Plustek Scanner Thanks Anthony | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: Plustek driver
From: ####@####.#### (G. Jaeger) Date: 9 Jun 2000 17:37:55 -0000 Message-Id: <130Sjm-0CYkVMC@fwd05.sul.t-online.de> On Fri, 09 Jun 2000 10:19:29 -0500, Anthony Amaro Jr. wrote: >I have a similar situation with loading the printer driver. Here is the >error message I get after typing the command "make -f MakeKernel load": > > >make[1]: Entering directory `/public/sane-1.0.1/backend/plustek_driver' >/sbin/modprobe pt_drv || exit 1 >/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_memcpy >/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_memset >/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol >best_copy_to_user >/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol >best_copy_from_user >/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: insmod >/lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o failed >/lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_memcpy >/lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_memset >/lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_copy_to_user >/lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_copy_from_user >/lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: insmod /lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o failed >/lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: insmod pt_drv failed >make[1]: *** [load] Error 1 >make[1]: Leaving directory `/public/sane-1.0.1/backend/plustek_driver' >make: *** [load] Error 2 > > >I followed the installation steps verbatim, but it doesn't seem to want >to load the pt_drv module. But then I run the "plustek_scan" program and >it makes the scanner light turn on and locks up when it says it is >scanning. Here is my setup: > >AMD K6III-450 >IWILL 100+ Motherboard >Quantum Bigfoot 8.4GB HD, IDE >2 ATAPI CD-ROMS, 24x >no SCSI devices, although using SCSI emulation to get the CD-ROMS to >work >HP Deskjet 712C printer, connected to 4830P Plustek Scanner > >Thanks > >Anthony > Hi Anthony, first of all, forget the plustek_scan program, it currently does nothing, I first used it for debugging, then I decided to rewrite the whole driver. In Version 0.36, there's no plustek_scan... The unresolved symbol problem is quite strange because this could only be caused by the compiler. If you have a look at the source-code you'll never find these functions. Maybe you should turn off the -O2 or -O flag in the MakeKernel file (search for DEBFLAGS). Maybe this helps. Gerhard I also tried the driver using Kernel 2.2.14 (but a SuSE) and encountered no problems. Next week I can check for these symbols. ---------------------------------------- ####@####.#### ---------------------------------------- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: Plustek driver
From: ####@####.#### Date: 9 Jun 2000 22:36:38 -0000 Message-Id: <3941719D.3E8C2A13@bellsouth.net> "Anthony Amaro Jr." wrote: > > I have a similar situation with loading the printer driver. Here is the > error message I get after typing the command "make -f MakeKernel load": > > make[1]: Entering directory `/public/sane-1.0.1/backend/plustek_driver' > /sbin/modprobe pt_drv || exit 1 > /lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_memcpy > /lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_memset > /lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol > best_copy_to_user > /lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol > best_copy_from_user > /lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o: insmod > /lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/misc/pt_drv.o failed > /lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_memcpy > /lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_memset > /lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_copy_to_user > /lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: unresolved symbol best_copy_from_user > /lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: insmod /lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o failed > /lib/modules/misc/pt_drv.o: insmod pt_drv failed > make[1]: *** [load] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/public/sane-1.0.1/backend/plustek_driver' > make: *** [load] Error 2 > > I followed the installation steps verbatim, but it doesn't seem to want > to load the pt_drv module. But then I run the "plustek_scan" program and > it makes the scanner light turn on and locks up when it says it is > scanning. Here is my setup: > Are you sure that the parport and parport_pc modules are loaded (lsmod should list them)? If not, try "modprobe parport" and "modprobe parport_pc" and then try insmod pt_drv (modprobe pt_drv is probably better). Kevin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: Plustek driver
From: "Jaeger, Gerhard" ####@####.#### Date: 20 Jun 2000 10:09:55 -0000 Message-Id: <00062012102805.19087@dagobert> Hi Anthony, while browsing through the Deja.com usenet forums ( http://www.deja.com/usenet/ ) I found, that quite a lot of people have similar problem after building modules or even the kernel on RedHat 6.2. Simply search for best_memcpy and you will get about 50 hits. Here are some answer on the question what to do when the unresolved message occurs. Answer 1: >Here is how I compile a new Kernel: > > make xconfig > make dep > make bzImage > make modules > make modules_install > edit lilo.conf with you favorite editor > make install > >The last 'make install' does all the copying of needed files, and it even >runs 'lilo' for you. Answer 2: > I was having problems building a 3rd Party driver under RedHat Linux 6.2. > The driver includes "linux/string.h". The process always yielded > unresolved symbol errors (best_memset, best_memmove, etc.). > > If you experience these problems, a quick workaround is to rebuild your > kernel, but when configuring it, make sure that you disable "CPU Specific > (MMX/MMX2) Optimization Functions", under the "Processor Type and > Features" option. If you still have difficulties, try setting the "Processor > Family" to 386 and rebuilding. > > Make sure that you do the complete build cycle: > > make dep > make clean > make {zImage | bzImage} > make modules > make modules_install It seems to me, that a proper build/install cycle will help. Maybe you'll find another way. Hope this helps Gerhard | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Plustek driver
From: Sandro Lemos Machado ####@####.#### Date: 6 Nov 2000 17:52:49 -0000 Message-Id: <20001106.17531300@geoamb.eng.ufba.br> Dear sirs, I have a Plustek Opticpro 9636P scanner and I have used the Plustek driver and sane in order to work with. The problem is that sometimes the when i type scanimage -L, another scanner is identified, as 600 6000P or even others... I am using mov=4, because was suggested for Opticpro 9636P, but when the end of the scanner is reached, a strong noise occurs. There is a way of setup manually the type of scanner we are working? Best regards, Sandro Lemos Machado | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: Plustek driver
From: ####@####.#### (G. Jaeger) Date: 7 Nov 2000 18:09:47 -0000 Message-Id: <13tDE0-1SoXQXC@fwd01.sul.t-online.com> On Mon, 06 Nov 2000 17:53:13 GMT, Sandro Lemos Machado wrote: >Dear sirs, I have a Plustek Opticpro 9636P scanner and I have used the >Plustek driver and sane in order to work with. The problem is that >sometimes the when i type scanimage -L, another scanner is identified, as >600 6000P or even others... I am using mov=4, because was suggested for >Opticpro 9636P, but when the end of the scanner is reached, a strong >noise occurs. There is a way of setup manually the type of scanner we are >working? > Best regards, > > Sandro Lemos Machado > Hi Sandro, can you please enable the debug messages (uncomment the line #Debug=y in the Makefile), recompile and reload. Please send us the output of dmesg for the case the P9636 has been detected and for the case a wrong model has been detected. There's currently no way of setting a specific model! Gerhard ---------------------------------------- ####@####.#### ---------------------------------------- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
plustek driver
From: root ####@####.#### Date: 1 May 2001 09:10:45 -0000 Message-Id: <3AEE7942.DC4731B2@a-city.de> Hi ! I´m a Linux newbie an have following problem : I do all so as in the German Installation txt but when I´m type make install then the System replies that I´m have the wrong Kernel - like 2.4.0 is the right kernel - i´m have 2.4.0.4GB . So the loading fails. :-( I´m working with Suse 7.1 Professional Version. You writing in the Faq that my Kernel path is wrong. How can I correct that ? If it´s possible ,can you reply me in German - you see me English is bad . Thankx ! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: plustek driver
From: ####@####.#### Date: 2 May 2001 13:00:37 -0000 Message-Id: <14uwFH-1iOHBoC@fwd03.sul.t-online.com> Hi, the FAQ is correct, except for the SuSE 7.1 distribution. They have a problem with their header files: To work around this problem, you have to patch the file: /usr/src/linux/include/linux/version.h Simply change the line #define UTS_RELEASE "2.4.0" to #define UTS_RELEASE "2.4.0-4GB" After changing this, rebuild the driver This should help. Gerhard >----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----- >Absender: ####@####.#### >Betreff: plustek driver >Empfänger: ####@####.#### >Datum: 01. Mai 2001 10:52 > > Hi ! > > I´m a Linux newbie an have following problem : > > I do all so as in the German Installation txt but when I´m type make > install then the System replies that I´m have the wrong Kernel - like > 2.4.0 is the right kernel - i´m have 2.4.0.4GB . > > So the loading fails. :-( > > I´m working with Suse 7.1 Professional Version. > > You writing in the Faq that my Kernel path is wrong. > How can I correct that ? > > If it´s possible ,can you reply me in German - you see me English is bad > . > > Thankx ! > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.#### > For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.#### > > | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
plustek driver
From: "Mladen Knezic" ####@####.#### Date: 16 Sep 2001 15:30:18 -0000 Message-Id: <000a01c13ed5$2979f860$5d851dc3@free> i'm using linux mandrake 8.0 and sane 1.0.4+ . i have made my LG Electronics work with pxscan(plustek) . i can control scaner with limitations(i must be careful with commands because it says that it can't recognize scaner model) and i can scane but i cant get no picture . i get tiff image with white block on black background . block is in dimensions i scaned . please if anyone knows what is the problem i would be grateful if he sends me a mail with his opinion . THX mladen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: plustek driver
From: "Jaeger, Gerhard" ####@####.#### Date: 4 Oct 2001 13:46:14 -0000 Message-Id: <01100415483506.00760@ruebennase> Hi Mladen, AFAIK the pxscan from Gustav Krol is used to control Primax Scanner and not Plustek scanner You might contact the Primax guys... Gerhard On Sunday, 16. September 2001 19:29, Mladen Knezic wrote: > i'm using linux mandrake 8.0 and sane 1.0.4+ . i have made my LG > Electronics work with pxscan(plustek) . i can control scaner with > limitations(i must be careful with commands because it says that it can't > recognize scaner model) and i can scane but i cant get no picture . i get > tiff image with white block on black background . block is in dimensions i > scaned . please if anyone knows what is the problem i would be grateful if > he sends me a mail with his opinion . THX > mladen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 2 [>] [>>] |