gnupic: Rep:Re: Rep:Re: picprg


Previous by date: 20 Mar 2002 15:33:39 -0000 Re: Rep:Re: picprg, Mike Weiblen
Next by date: 20 Mar 2002 15:33:39 -0000 Re: picprg, Mark J. Dulcey
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 20 Mar 2002 15:33:39 -0000 Re: Rep:Re: Rep:Re: picprg, Byron A Jeff

Subject: Rep:Re: Rep:Re: picprg
From: ####@####.####
Date: 20 Mar 2002 15:33:39 -0000
Message-Id: <200203201527.0850@th00.opsion.fr>

There are now two versions which were born from
original picprg from Brian Lane. Byron made one and
the other is which I modified.
I only want to join the two versions into one. AFAIK
the only main difference is the number of processors
supported by each one.
That's shouldn't be a difficult task. I have read
that BAJ's picprg support 16F84, 16F87x, and 16F62x.
Anyone missing?
My version support 16F84, 16F876 (I have not tested
with others, but I think it should work with 16F87x,
because the programming algorithm is the same). So I
should add support for 16F62x and we will have the
same funcionality which both versions.
I think I can do it in little time. But I wonder what
do you think about this. I don't want to be the only
one using  this version.

Carlos

-----Mensaje de origen-----
De: "andy n1yew" ####@####.####
Para: ####@####.####
Fecha: 20/03/02
Asunto: Re: Rep:Re: picprg

originally, i made the source forge and the
reflector(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/picprg/)

if any one wishes to continue it, ask and ye shall be
given

andy

----- Original Message -----
From: ####@####.####
To: ####@####.#### (Byron A Jeff)>
Cc: ####@####.####
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 6:13 AM
Subject: Rep:Re: picprg


There's another modified version of picprg at:
http://picprg.sourceforge.net
I have tried with 16F84 and 16F876 and it works fine.

I think it would be better if there was only one
modified picprg, accepted by everybody. Byron, could
we work together on this? .

Carlos

-----Mensaje de origen-----
De: ####@####.#### (Byron A Jeff)
Para: ####@####.#### (John Duncan)
Fecha: 19/03/02
Asunto: Re: picprg

>
> Jesse,
>
> You may like to try picprg 2.2, found at:
>
>    http://www.nexuscomputing.com/picpgmr.shtml
>
> This is a general parallel port programmer for
Linux.  You can configure it
> to drive pretty well any parallel port programmer.
I have been using it
> for a few years, with my home made programmer, with
great success.  This
> version will only work for the 16F84.  I have
modified mine to programme
> 16F628 parts as well.

I also have an updated version on my PIC page. Though
Brian never published
a GPL copy, he told me in correspondence that he
wanted picprg to be GPL'd

http://www.finitesite.com/d3jsys

Hope this helps,

BAJ

-----------------------------------------------------
----------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
####@####.####
For additional commands, e-mail:
####@####.####


_____________________________________________________
_______________________
__
mensaje enviado desde http://www.iespana.es
emails (pop)-paginas web (espacio
ilimitado)-agenda-favoritos
(bookmarks)-foros -Chat



-----------------------------------------------------
----------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
####@####.####
For additional commands, e-mail:
####@####.####


 
______________________________________________________________________________
mensaje enviado desde http://www.iespana.es
emails (pop)-paginas web (espacio ilimitado)-agenda-favoritos (bookmarks)-foros -Chat



Previous by date: 20 Mar 2002 15:33:39 -0000 Re: Rep:Re: picprg, Mike Weiblen
Next by date: 20 Mar 2002 15:33:39 -0000 Re: picprg, Mark J. Dulcey
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 20 Mar 2002 15:33:39 -0000 Re: Rep:Re: Rep:Re: picprg, Byron A Jeff


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.