gnupic: fate of 18F0x0 chips?


Previous by date: 26 Mar 2002 07:10:41 -0000 Re: fate of 18F0x0 chips?, Garst R. Reese
Next by date: 26 Mar 2002 07:10:41 -0000 Re: fate of 18F0x0 chips?, Garst R. Reese
Previous in thread: 26 Mar 2002 07:10:41 -0000 Re: fate of 18F0x0 chips?, Garst R. Reese
Next in thread: 26 Mar 2002 07:10:41 -0000 Re: fate of 18F0x0 chips?, Garst R. Reese

Subject: Re: fate of 18F0x0 chips?
From: "James Newton, webmaster" ####@####.####
Date: 26 Mar 2002 07:10:41 -0000
Message-Id: <005801c1d494$5797d0a0$0100a8c0@main>

Sure, Ubicom chips also draw less power...

http://www.sxlist.com/techref/ubicom/power.htm

James Newton, host:
http://www.sxlist.com
####@####.####
1-619-652-0593 VM
1-208-279-8767 FAX

----- Original Message -----
From: "Garst R. Reese" ####@####.####
To: "James Newton's Massmind" ####@####.####
Cc: "Eric Smith" ####@####.#### ####@####.####
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 21:08
Subject: Re: fate of 18F0x0 chips?


James Newton's Massmind wrote:
>
> they have also dropped the top speed from 100mhz to 75...
> ...still the fastest, but focused more on price and reliable
production... And on the new IP 2000 chip.i
>
Don't forget power consumption in your trade-off matrix.
Garst

-----------------------------------------------------------------
----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####




Previous by date: 26 Mar 2002 07:10:41 -0000 Re: fate of 18F0x0 chips?, Garst R. Reese
Next by date: 26 Mar 2002 07:10:41 -0000 Re: fate of 18F0x0 chips?, Garst R. Reese
Previous in thread: 26 Mar 2002 07:10:41 -0000 Re: fate of 18F0x0 chips?, Garst R. Reese
Next in thread: 26 Mar 2002 07:10:41 -0000 Re: fate of 18F0x0 chips?, Garst R. Reese


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.