gnupic: recommended C compiler ??


Previous by date: 11 Apr 2002 20:53:17 -0000 Re: recommended C compiler ??, Linas Vepstas
Next by date: 11 Apr 2002 20:53:17 -0000 Mac PIC tools: one more thing, Rick Mann
Previous in thread: 11 Apr 2002 20:53:17 -0000 Re: recommended C compiler ??, Linas Vepstas
Next in thread: 11 Apr 2002 20:53:17 -0000 Re: recommended C compiler ??, Andreas Junge - ATT

Subject: Re: recommended C compiler ??
From: Rick Mann ####@####.####
Date: 11 Apr 2002 20:53:17 -0000
Message-Id: <B8DB4406.415C%rmann@latencyzero.com>

on 4/11/02 11:18 AM, John Rehwinkel at ####@####.#### wrote:

>> I highly recommended using C compiler for PIC from Hi-Tech
>> (http://www.htsoft.com). They have a demo version for 21-day
>> free using, and as well as a lite version of that.
> 
> Unfortunately, it's a DOS based compiler.  I figure I'll wait
> until Scott gets his running then port it to netBSD, Solaris,
> and MacOS X (the systems I develop PIC code on).  I haven't
> fired up a DOS emulator in 8 months (that was to run the
> silly Simple Switcher software from National that only runs
> under DOS even though it's written in Java.  Moronic.).

For those of you using Macs, I've ported gpasm to the Mac as a CodeWarrior
tool. It's not perfect but lets you use CodeWarrior's include path
management and error-to-source linking. *much* more convenient (to me) than
make/CLI.

I'm working on getting a debugger plugin written that will allow you to use
CodeWarrior's debugger with gpsim, but that will be a while (the API is not
public).

-- 
Rick



Previous by date: 11 Apr 2002 20:53:17 -0000 Re: recommended C compiler ??, Linas Vepstas
Next by date: 11 Apr 2002 20:53:17 -0000 Mac PIC tools: one more thing, Rick Mann
Previous in thread: 11 Apr 2002 20:53:17 -0000 Re: recommended C compiler ??, Linas Vepstas
Next in thread: 11 Apr 2002 20:53:17 -0000 Re: recommended C compiler ??, Andreas Junge - ATT


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.