gnupic: Re: Segmentation fault ... possible solution


Previous by date: 29 May 2002 13:37:27 -0000 Re: Segmentation fault ... possible solution, Philip Restuccia
Next by date: 29 May 2002 13:37:27 -0000 Re: Segmentation fault ... did I bite off more then the current release can do?, Scott Dattalo
Previous in thread: 29 May 2002 13:37:27 -0000 Re: Segmentation fault ... possible solution, Philip Restuccia
Next in thread: 29 May 2002 13:37:27 -0000 Re: Segmentation fault ... possible solution, Philip Restuccia

Subject: Re: Segmentation fault ... possible solution
From: Scott Dattalo ####@####.####
Date: 29 May 2002 13:37:27 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205290625010.22582-100000@ruckus.brouhaha.com>

On Wed, 29 May 2002, Philip Restuccia wrote:

> Robert Warner wrote:
> > 
> > Ok, this works ...
> > 
> > //void skip_space(void)
> > void skip_space( int *prxout)
> > {
> > //    int       *prxout = &rxout;               //RXWTest
> 
> Again, like I stated in my reply to your previous post, this will work
> (assuming rxout is global) only because rxout will have been initialized
> to 0, as are all global variables that are not otherwise explicitly initialized.

Actually, global variables are *not* implicitly initialized to zero by 
SDCC.

Scott


Previous by date: 29 May 2002 13:37:27 -0000 Re: Segmentation fault ... possible solution, Philip Restuccia
Next by date: 29 May 2002 13:37:27 -0000 Re: Segmentation fault ... did I bite off more then the current release can do?, Scott Dattalo
Previous in thread: 29 May 2002 13:37:27 -0000 Re: Segmentation fault ... possible solution, Philip Restuccia
Next in thread: 29 May 2002 13:37:27 -0000 Re: Segmentation fault ... possible solution, Philip Restuccia


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.