gnupic: gpasm question, banksel & 16f877 (fwd)
Subject:
Re: gpasm question, banksel & 16f877 (fwd)
From:
Craig Franklin ####@####.####
Date:
8 Jun 2002 12:51:56 -0000
Message-Id: <3D01FC8A.6CD22AFF@attbi.com>
The banksel directive is not yet supported. Microchip has published
some macros that might work. You will have to search for them though.
If you have a minute, please add banksel to a new feature request on the
Sourceforge website. One existed for gpasm, but it didn't make the move
to gputils.
Please explain what you mean by changing the case on 'pic16f877.inc'.
Do you mean the case of filename 'p16f877.inc'?
Scott Dattalo wrote:
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 23:28:22 -0400
> From: Will Ware ####@####.####
> To: ####@####.####
> Subject: gpasm question, banksel & 16f877
>
> I was trying to assemble some 16f877 code with gpasm and it choked
> on the 'banksel' opcode. This is with gputils-0.10.3 RPM installed
> on a Red Hat 7.1 system. I changed the case on 'pic16f877.inc' as
> required.
>
> The closest thing I found to a clue was the 'BANK' opcode in the
> op_sx table in directive.c, which appears to be available only for
> "Scenix" processors - I don't know what those are, but apparently
> the 877 is not one of them.
>
> Any thoughts or suggestions?
>
> Thanks very much,
> Will Ware
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
