gnupic: New to PICs


Previous by date: 18 Sep 2002 11:27:02 -0000 Re: New to PICs, matthew mccabe
Next by date: 18 Sep 2002 11:27:02 -0000 Re: New to PICs, Byron A Jeff
Previous in thread: 18 Sep 2002 11:27:02 -0000 Re: New to PICs, matthew mccabe
Next in thread: 18 Sep 2002 11:27:02 -0000 Re: New to PICs, Byron A Jeff

Subject: Re: New to PICs
From: ####@####.#### (Byron A Jeff)
Date: 18 Sep 2002 11:27:02 -0000
Message-Id: <200209181125.g8IBPLX04861@cleon.cc.gatech.edu>

> 
> 
> Hi,
> I'm new to PIC chips.
> I do have some electronic knowledge and I am a programmer. I use Linux daily
> so I shouldn't be completely in the dark.

Good start.

> 
> I'm planning on starting with the PIC16F84.

Bad start. Take a read of my 16F628 comparison page:

http://www.finitesite.com/d3jsys/16F628.html

You'll never consider a 16F84 again.

> My question is: what chip programmer should I get or make?

You can put together one of my Trivial programmers with RatShack parts and
an afternoon worth of time. Located here:

http://www.finitesite.com/d3jsys

Note that I have a link to the high voltage programmer.

> 
> I saw one at www.imagesco.com It's called EPIC Programmer.
> 
> Will this programmer work with any of the Linux compilers? 

Programmers are orthogonal to development software. The only compatibility
issue is the programming software. If it's a Tait style programmer then it
should work fine with picprg2.3d which is found on my pages above.


> And if so which ones?

Asked and answered.

> Recomondations?

Don't use a 16F84. The 16F628 is so much better and so much cheaper that it's
a slam dunk.

BAJ

Previous by date: 18 Sep 2002 11:27:02 -0000 Re: New to PICs, matthew mccabe
Next by date: 18 Sep 2002 11:27:02 -0000 Re: New to PICs, Byron A Jeff
Previous in thread: 18 Sep 2002 11:27:02 -0000 Re: New to PICs, matthew mccabe
Next in thread: 18 Sep 2002 11:27:02 -0000 Re: New to PICs, Byron A Jeff


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.