gnupic: gpasm question/may be a bug


Previous by date: 19 Oct 2002 00:56:58 -0000 Re: gpasm question/may be a bug, Samuel Tardieu
Next by date: 19 Oct 2002 00:56:58 -0000 Re: gpasm question/may be a bug, Tobias Schlottke
Previous in thread: 19 Oct 2002 00:56:58 -0000 Re: gpasm question/may be a bug, Samuel Tardieu
Next in thread: 19 Oct 2002 00:56:58 -0000 Re: gpasm question/may be a bug, Tobias Schlottke

Subject: Re: gpasm question/may be a bug
From: Craig Franklin ####@####.####
Date: 19 Oct 2002 00:56:58 -0000
Message-Id: <3DB0AD62.1D45FB32@attbi.com>

A warning will be generated if you use version >= 0.10.2.

Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> 
> Tobias> Ok, but if it _has_ to be f or w, at least a warning would be
> Tobias> nice to have. I.E. if I write bsf 0x20,8 the compiler
> Tobias> generates a warning that 8 is out of range.  I feel xorwf
> Tobias> PORTB,PORTB easier to read, even if the second argument must
> Tobias> be the same like the first one (or equal w).
> 
> In this case, "xorwf INDF,INDF" looks clearer than "xorwf INDF,f", but
> will be incorrectly compiled as "xorwf INDF,w" as "INDF" is zero :)
> 
> Tobias> ok, if you know how the assembler is implemented, then there
> Tobias> is no mistery.
> 
> I don't; I only looked at the datasheet.
> 
>   Sam
> --
> Samuel Tardieu -- ####@####.#### -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####

Previous by date: 19 Oct 2002 00:56:58 -0000 Re: gpasm question/may be a bug, Samuel Tardieu
Next by date: 19 Oct 2002 00:56:58 -0000 Re: gpasm question/may be a bug, Tobias Schlottke
Previous in thread: 19 Oct 2002 00:56:58 -0000 Re: gpasm question/may be a bug, Samuel Tardieu
Next in thread: 19 Oct 2002 00:56:58 -0000 Re: gpasm question/may be a bug, Tobias Schlottke


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.