gnupic: yet more picp
Subject:
Re: yet more picp
From:
Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date:
4 Nov 2002 15:22:58 -0000
Message-Id: <3DC68FD0.6010702@linuxhacker.org>
Andrew Pines wrote:
> be destroyed (yes, yes, I know they were concerned that someone might
> spot-erase just the config bits with a focused beam of UV light but if
> you're that worried about security don't use a windowed part -- Duh).
It's apparently quite easy to melt the top off a plastic part, and the
die is the same as that in a ceramic package.
Not that I'm condoning their decision to make the code protect bits
unerasable- been there, done that, have the dead PIC to prove it...
--
------------ Alex Holden - http://www.linuxhacker.org ------------
If it doesn't work, you're not hitting it with a big enough hammer
