gnupic: Named cblocks?


Previous by date: 16 Mar 2004 02:22:55 +0000 Re: More nocturnal programming problems, Craig Franklin
Next by date: 16 Mar 2004 02:22:55 +0000 Re: Named cblocks?, David Willmore
Previous in thread: 16 Mar 2004 02:22:55 +0000 Named cblocks?, David Willmore
Next in thread: 16 Mar 2004 02:22:55 +0000 Re: Named cblocks?, David Willmore

Subject: Re: Named cblocks?
From: Craig Franklin ####@####.####
Date: 16 Mar 2004 02:22:55 +0000
Message-Id: <1079403737.1458.20.camel@r2d2>

On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 03:43, David Willmore wrote:
> Hello, all.
> 
> I was just not sleeping and decided to do a bit of coding--
> yes, I know, not recommended.  But, on the good side, I got
> to thinking.  I wanted to BANKSEL between cblocks of variables
> and when I went to type in the 'name' of the cblock, it 
> struck me that there isn't one.  I could use any of the 
> variables in there, but the code would read better if the 
> name indicated the whole *class* of variables I'm about to
> play with.
> 
> Shall I just put in a set of equates to 'name' my cblocks
> or is there some common method of doing this that has not
> occured to my sleep deprived mind?
> 

You have to be careful with CBLOCK.  IIRC, it can cross a bank
boundary.  So your banksel wouldn't be guaranteed to be correct.

If you use relocatable code, data in one section is always in the same
bank, so putting in a dummy symbol for the bank switching works.

> Cheers,
> David
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
> 


Previous by date: 16 Mar 2004 02:22:55 +0000 Re: More nocturnal programming problems, Craig Franklin
Next by date: 16 Mar 2004 02:22:55 +0000 Re: Named cblocks?, David Willmore
Previous in thread: 16 Mar 2004 02:22:55 +0000 Named cblocks?, David Willmore
Next in thread: 16 Mar 2004 02:22:55 +0000 Re: Named cblocks?, David Willmore


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.