gnupic: gpasm support for PICs???
Subject:
Re: gpasm support for PICs???
From:
Easy B ####@####.####
Date:
27 Mar 2004 16:14:30 +0000
Message-Id: <C8366AA8-8009-11D8-85DF-003065B74C10@freesurf.ch>
So far I know, the only difference between the L types and the normal
ones is that they can run with lower Voltages.
Cheers
Ezra.
Am 27.03.2004 um 02:56 schrieb Craig Franklin:
> On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 15:26, Sriram Chadalavada wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>> I am new to gputils and this is my first email to the mailing list.
>>
>> For our project, we need to program the following PICs:
>>
>> 18LF4220
>> 18LF2320
>> 18LF2220
>>
>> I was wondering if these are supported by gpasm. Please let me know.
>> This
>> might make the difference in a choice between gputils and MPLAB.
>>
>
> Are these devices in production? I don't see them on the website. I
> also don't see them in MPLAB 6.4.
>
> They are probably very close to the
>
> 18F4220
> 18F2320
> 18F2220
>
> which are supported. Adding processors is trivial, but it looks like
> gputils list is up to date. Are these planned devices that haven't
> reached production?
>
>> Thanks,
>> Sriram
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
>> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
