gnupic: gpal fork
Subject:
Re: gpal fork
From:
Michiel Boerman ####@####.####
Date:
8 Mar 2004 10:55:58 -0000
Message-Id: <65FCA6B4-70EA-11D8-AFE1-000502D16926@id5r.nl>
I expect the other guy is smart enough not integrate his software with
Craig's but call gpal as a seperate process. Not much you can do
against that under GPL. And my guess is that Craig is not pissed off
at the legal issue but at someone making a profit out of his efforts
while keeping theirs for themselves.
...Like cycling into a strong wind for hours and then finding somone
has been riding in your wake all the time. They havent hurt you in any
way but still you feel like stopping at a quiet spot and breaking all
their bones (if they have any)
Michiel
On Mar 8, 2004, at 7:48 AM, j_post wrote:
> On Sunday 07 March 2004 08:26 pm, Craig Franklin wrote:
>> We won't have access to their sources.
>> GPL will be satisfied.
>>
> Those two statements contradict. Unless there's more to the story than
> you've
> presented, the person in question will be violating your copyright.
> Time to
> see a lawyer ;-)
>
> JP
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
