gnupic: gpal fork
Subject:
Fwd: gpal fork
From:
Michiel Boerman ####@####.####
Date:
9 Mar 2004 15:50:19 -0000
Message-Id: <AA695EAE-71DC-11D8-B0A2-000502D16926@id5r.nl>
Hmm, I find this thing that when you reply to a message from the gnupic
list it only gets sent to the original poster quite annoying. Can't
that be changed?
anyway. I'll repost my previous messages to the list.
Begin forwarded message:
>
> OF COURSE we are interested in the fork. OO and extra types sound
> interesting enough. I'ts just that I personally would like to see a
> good open source language standard optimized for pics being
> developed. Gpal is a very promising candidate but not yet fully
> evolved. Forking in this stage is too close to sabotage in my book
>
> Michiel
>
> On Mar 8, 2004, at 5:56 PM, pic00 wrote:
>
>> Is someone interrested in the fork ?
>> It adds some OO capability, and more types compared to gpal.
>> In difference, the language is stronger, variables and procedures
>> must be declared prior it's usage, subprocedures and -functions are
>> allowed and for the main program's and modules little changes or
>> addition are planned.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
>> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>>
>
