gnupic: gputils linker/assembler integration in higher level language


Previous by date: 20 Sep 2004 18:11:07 +0100 Re: relocation of 16 bit addresses, George M. Gallant
Next by date: 20 Sep 2004 18:11:07 +0100 Proposal for gpdasm feature, Jeff
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 20 Sep 2004 18:11:07 +0100 Re: gputils linker/assembler integration in higher level language, Craig Franklin

Subject: gputils linker/assembler integration in higher level language
From: ####@####.####
Date: 20 Sep 2004 18:11:07 +0100
Message-Id: <12897.1095700240@www21.gmx.net>

I want the follow pseudo ASM opcodes for the linker.
How it's possible to implement this ? any idea ?

GLOBAL _foo
SIGNAT _foo,23423423    // 32 bit signature value
        if two or more signature exists for the same procedure,
        the linker should exit with a error: signature mismatch.
FNADDR _foo             // _foo has it's address taken
FNARG  _foo,_bar        // evalutation of _foo requires a call to _bar
FNBREAK _bar,_foo       // breakes call graph for function _bar not rooting
in _
foo
FNCALL _foo,_bar        // _foo calls _bar;
FNCONF psect,auto,args  // linker should place the follow variables int
psect:
                        // all automatic variables prepending auto
                        // all arg variables prepending arg
FNINDIF _foo,23423423   // function performes indirect call using signature
...
FNSIZE  _foo,local,args // function foo has <n>local variables and <n> bytes
arg
s
FNROOT  _main           // informs the linker, that the function is a root
graph

If signat is found, all function must have a signat.
a signature of zero is illegal.
if a FNROOT is found, the FN... is activated and it's the linker
responsability
to allocate the variables. Depending on the call flow analisys and
temporary variable space needed, the linker should issue as many overlay
memory base as possible.

-- 
GMX ProMail mit bestem Virenschutz http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail
+++ Empfehlung der Redaktion +++ Internet Professionell 10/04 +++


Previous by date: 20 Sep 2004 18:11:07 +0100 Re: relocation of 16 bit addresses, George M. Gallant
Next by date: 20 Sep 2004 18:11:07 +0100 Proposal for gpdasm feature, Jeff
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 20 Sep 2004 18:11:07 +0100 Re: gputils linker/assembler integration in higher level language, Craig Franklin


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.