gnupic: COD question


Previous by date: 24 Sep 2004 02:38:47 +0100 Re: improved banksel and pagsel, Craig Franklin
Next by date: 24 Sep 2004 02:38:47 +0100 Re: A new feature?, Craig Franklin
Previous in thread: 24 Sep 2004 02:38:47 +0100 COD question, nisma.gmx.net
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: COD question
From: Craig Franklin ####@####.####
Date: 24 Sep 2004 02:38:47 +0100
Message-Id: <41528BAF.8080605@users.sourceforge.net>

####@####.#### wrote:

>Hi, 
>why the gpasm don't generate a standard symbol table in the cod file?
>Currently, it generates only a long symbol table.
>
>  
>
from gpcod.h:

 * Types of data blocks:
 * short symbol table - a list of symbols in the "short format", which
 *     means that the symbol name is restricted to 12 characters. This
 *     is an old format and is not provided by gpasm.
 * long symbol table - a list of symbols in the "long format". Like the
 *     short symbol table except the symbol names can be up to 255 chars.

As I understand it, long can do everything that short can.  Only makes 
the files bigger.

Previous by date: 24 Sep 2004 02:38:47 +0100 Re: improved banksel and pagsel, Craig Franklin
Next by date: 24 Sep 2004 02:38:47 +0100 Re: A new feature?, Craig Franklin
Previous in thread: 24 Sep 2004 02:38:47 +0100 COD question, nisma.gmx.net
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.