gnupic: [PATCH] gpal Code for the 16e Family


Previous by date: 14 Oct 2004 04:33:13 +0100 Re: gpsim's gui, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 14 Oct 2004 04:33:13 +0100 Re: [PATCH] gpasm scan.l, Craig Franklin
Previous in thread: 14 Oct 2004 04:33:13 +0100 Re: [PATCH] gpal Code for the 16e Family, Robert James Kaes
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpal Code for the 16e Family
From: Craig Franklin ####@####.####
Date: 14 Oct 2004 04:33:13 +0100
Message-Id: <416DAD5C.8070309@users.sourceforge.net>

Robert James Kaes wrote:

>On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Craig Franklin wrote:
>  
>
>>Thanks for the patch.
>>
>>I haven't finished the 18f devices.  If you command "gpal -l" they 
>>aren't listed.  That explains some of the errors.
>>
>>Please continue working on it if you like.  I have a TODO list if you 
>>run out of things to work on.  Don't spend any time improving the 
>>banksel.  I have a big patch for it that is mostly done.
>>    
>>
>
>Thanks for the info.  I didn't plan on doing any more with the BANKSEL
>directives.  The patch removed the unneeded ones, and I didn't feel
>confident enough with my understanding of the gpal source to know
>which other ones may or may not be removed.
>
>One thing I would appreciate having would be a working example of gpal
>code for any supported processor.  Perhaps the canonical blinking
>light example. :)  Basically, I would like to see how one accesses the
>various ports and registers on a PIC from a gpal application.  Once I
>have that understanding, I can work on getting the 18f family up to
>speed.
>
>  
>

There is an example (3 maybe) in gputils-extra.

>Thanks for any help you can provide.
>        -- Robert
>
>  
>


Previous by date: 14 Oct 2004 04:33:13 +0100 Re: gpsim's gui, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 14 Oct 2004 04:33:13 +0100 Re: [PATCH] gpasm scan.l, Craig Franklin
Previous in thread: 14 Oct 2004 04:33:13 +0100 Re: [PATCH] gpal Code for the 16e Family, Robert James Kaes
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.