gnupic: question - GPDASM and register names


Previous by date: 28 Oct 2004 14:30:57 +0100 Re: question - GPDASM and register names, Jeff
Next by date: 28 Oct 2004 14:30:57 +0100 Re: question - GPDASM and register names, Craig Franklin
Previous in thread: 28 Oct 2004 14:30:57 +0100 Re: question - GPDASM and register names, Jeff
Next in thread: 28 Oct 2004 14:30:57 +0100 Re: question - GPDASM and register names, Craig Franklin

Subject: Re: question - GPDASM and register names
From: Craig Franklin ####@####.####
Date: 28 Oct 2004 14:30:57 +0100
Message-Id: <4180AE8C.3080106@users.sourceforge.net>

David McNab wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to persuade gpdasm to output register names instead 
> of numbers?
>
> Eg:
>     BSF STATUS,RP1
> instead of:
>     BSF 0x3, 0x6
> ?
>
> gpdasm demands a '-p proctype' argument when it runs, so I thought it 
> would exploit processor-specific knowledge to look up the names for 
> registers and bits
>
Here is my standard gpdasm speech:

gpdasm wasn't really a design goal of mine.  I needed a way to decode 
the program memory sections of microchip's object files.  Once I had the 
library functions complete, it was simple enough to create a standalone 
executable.  Because of its humble beginnings, it is very simple.  Only 
a single pass.  No advanced features.

gpdasm does everything I need it to.  So I really don't want to spend 
any time on it.  If someone were to provide patches, I would gladly 
accept them.  Of course, I will have final approval on the changes 
before they are committed.

Previous by date: 28 Oct 2004 14:30:57 +0100 Re: question - GPDASM and register names, Jeff
Next by date: 28 Oct 2004 14:30:57 +0100 Re: question - GPDASM and register names, Craig Franklin
Previous in thread: 28 Oct 2004 14:30:57 +0100 Re: question - GPDASM and register names, Jeff
Next in thread: 28 Oct 2004 14:30:57 +0100 Re: question - GPDASM and register names, Craig Franklin


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.