gnupic: Solved! (was: Re: PIC vs GPL question)


Previous by date: 5 Nov 2004 00:24:44 +0000 code protect (was: Re: PIC vs GPL question), David McNab
Next by date: 5 Nov 2004 00:24:44 +0000 Re: Solved! (was: Re: PIC vs GPL question), Byron A Jeff
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 5 Nov 2004 00:24:44 +0000 Re: Solved! (was: Re: PIC vs GPL question), Byron A Jeff

Subject: Solved! (was: Re: PIC vs GPL question)
From: David McNab ####@####.####
Date: 5 Nov 2004 00:24:44 +0000
Message-Id: <418AC845.8050508@rebirthing.co.nz>

Hi,

My original query arose from the need to add extra math capabilities to 
PicForth.

I came across a stack-based math package for PIC that's GPL'ed, hence 
the query to this list.

However, the free version of the Hi-Tech C compiler comes with a license 
which imposes zero encumbrance on generated code.

So all I need to do is write a simple C function for each mathematical 
function I need to perform, compile that function down to assembler, 
then wrap it into a PicForth function. This will give me the 
unencumbered code I've been needing.

Problem solved.

I could write the math libs myself, but who wants to reinvent wheels, 
especially when some clever bit-bashing assembler-heads have already 
done it better/faster/smaller than I'm likely to come up with?

Anyway, thanks for all your replies to the question.

-- 
Cheers
David

Previous by date: 5 Nov 2004 00:24:44 +0000 code protect (was: Re: PIC vs GPL question), David McNab
Next by date: 5 Nov 2004 00:24:44 +0000 Re: Solved! (was: Re: PIC vs GPL question), Byron A Jeff
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 5 Nov 2004 00:24:44 +0000 Re: Solved! (was: Re: PIC vs GPL question), Byron A Jeff


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.