gnupic: PICs on Linux


Previous by date: 12 Nov 2004 03:09:03 +0000 Re: PICs on Linux, Ryan Underwood
Next by date: 12 Nov 2004 03:09:03 +0000 Re: PICs on Linux, Bill Couture
Previous in thread: 12 Nov 2004 03:09:03 +0000 Re: PICs on Linux, Ryan Underwood
Next in thread: 12 Nov 2004 03:09:03 +0000 Re: PICs on Linux, Bill Couture

Subject: Re: PICs on Linux
From: Bill Couture ####@####.####
Date: 12 Nov 2004 03:09:03 +0000
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.10.10411112206210.-331373@junkvalue.speakeasy.net>

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Ryan Underwood wrote:

> Check ####@####.####  That is where the development
> related traffic happens.  ####@####.#### is still alive but
> most user questions are handled through the sourceforge tracker in these
> days.

OK, I'll take a look.

> > When I looked at DOSEMU, I quickly noticed that the CPU flags were being
> > done wrong.  I should look at it again and see if they have been fixed.
> 
> Can you be more specific please, and/or file and issue in the bug
> tracker?  This sounds like something that would be a good idea to fix.

I'll have to look at my archives, but as I remember when I saw that he
was computing flags by some logical method rather than doing the actual
operation and looking at the results, it didn't seem right to me (i've
done a 80x86 emulator before, in the mid-80's -- very useful as a
debugger).

The problem showed up with instructions like ADC and SBB, where CY was
not 0.  Thus, you had 3 values going into the computation and affecting
the flags, in which case the flags were wrong in some cases.

As I said, I'll have to go into my archives and try to find it.

Bill


Previous by date: 12 Nov 2004 03:09:03 +0000 Re: PICs on Linux, Ryan Underwood
Next by date: 12 Nov 2004 03:09:03 +0000 Re: PICs on Linux, Bill Couture
Previous in thread: 12 Nov 2004 03:09:03 +0000 Re: PICs on Linux, Ryan Underwood
Next in thread: 12 Nov 2004 03:09:03 +0000 Re: PICs on Linux, Bill Couture


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.