gnupic: another gpal fork


Previous by date: 17 Nov 2004 15:39:37 +0000 another gpal fork, Craig Franklin
Next by date: 17 Nov 2004 15:39:37 +0000 Requests for adding support to program chips to PikDev?, David Willmore
Previous in thread: 17 Nov 2004 15:39:37 +0000 another gpal fork, Craig Franklin
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: another gpal fork
From: ####@####.#### ####@####.####
Date: 17 Nov 2004 15:39:37 +0000
Message-Id: <111720041539.8933.419B709B00078E4C000022E5220588601402070405020E9D00A109070E9D0C@comcast.net>

Nisma has withdrawn the code from consideration, so no third party review is required.  Sorry for the false alarm.

-------------- Original message -------------- 

> Nisma and I have had another falling out. We may need counseling to get 
> through this one. 
> 
> It is a little unclear who Nisma is. 
> 
> http://www.linuxhacker.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?1:mss:3362:epcgcoknjahkgibjdnib 
> 
> I believe this is the same person who attempted a gpal fork for a 
> commercial application earlier this year using the name of pico, but I 
> am not sure. 
> 
> I need a third party to review his code and see if I am being 
> reasonable. He would like his changes to be committed to cvs. Here it is. 
> 
> http://gputils.sourceforge.net/nisma/ 
> 
> I don't want to bias a potential reviewer with my own comments. You can 
> send the comments privately and I will make sure they get to nisma. 
> 
> Thanks. 
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.#### 
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.#### 
> 

Previous by date: 17 Nov 2004 15:39:37 +0000 another gpal fork, Craig Franklin
Next by date: 17 Nov 2004 15:39:37 +0000 Requests for adding support to program chips to PikDev?, David Willmore
Previous in thread: 17 Nov 2004 15:39:37 +0000 another gpal fork, Craig Franklin
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.