gnupic: PIC VM and PIC-on-PIC emulation


Previous by date: 24 Dec 2004 14:11:57 +0000 Re: PIC VM and PIC-on-PIC emulation, George M. Gallant
Next by date: 24 Dec 2004 14:11:57 +0000 Re: PIC VM and PIC-on-PIC emulation, George M. Gallant
Previous in thread: 24 Dec 2004 14:11:57 +0000 Re: PIC VM and PIC-on-PIC emulation, George M. Gallant
Next in thread: 24 Dec 2004 14:11:57 +0000 Re: PIC VM and PIC-on-PIC emulation, George M. Gallant

Subject: Re: PIC VM and PIC-on-PIC emulation
From: David McNab ####@####.####
Date: 24 Dec 2004 14:11:57 +0000
Message-Id: <41CC23A5.8000206@rebirthing.co.nz>

George M. Gallant wrote:
> David,
> 
> Try the pic18f252. It is pin compatible with the 16f876. 40MHz, 32K byte 
> instruction, 1536 byte ram, 31 stack depth. Like
> a breathe of fresh air after the confines of the 876. I even run a 
> multi-tasking scheduler. Supported by gputils and SDCC.

Thanks for the suggestion.
I've actually got my eye on the 18f252.

Can you give me an idea on how /well/ it's supported by sdcc?
The only thing I've done with sdcc on the 876 so far is run a LED
counter prog, and I've not gone any further because I've had the feeling
that 876 support is not 100%. At the moment, using CCS (pseudo-)C compiler.

Are you saying that sdcc supports the 18f chips better than it does the
16f chips? Is it mature enough for real 18f development? Is its
optimiser up to scratch? Is it trustworthy with respect to generating
bank-switching code, etc?

-- 
Cheers
David



Previous by date: 24 Dec 2004 14:11:57 +0000 Re: PIC VM and PIC-on-PIC emulation, George M. Gallant
Next by date: 24 Dec 2004 14:11:57 +0000 Re: PIC VM and PIC-on-PIC emulation, George M. Gallant
Previous in thread: 24 Dec 2004 14:11:57 +0000 Re: PIC VM and PIC-on-PIC emulation, George M. Gallant
Next in thread: 24 Dec 2004 14:11:57 +0000 Re: PIC VM and PIC-on-PIC emulation, George M. Gallant


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.