gnupic: gpsim configure - should default to gtkextra1?


Previous by date: 9 Jan 2005 04:11:52 +0000 gpsim configure - should default to gtkextra1?, David McNab
Next by date: 9 Jan 2005 04:11:52 +0000 Re: GTK+Extra2.0 dependency hell, Geoff Horn
Previous in thread: 9 Jan 2005 04:11:52 +0000 gpsim configure - should default to gtkextra1?, David McNab
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: gpsim configure - should default to gtkextra1?
From: Scott Dattalo ####@####.####
Date: 9 Jan 2005 04:11:52 +0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0501082002320.16401@ruckus.brouhaha.com>

On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, David McNab wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Given the almost universal angst of compiling gtk+extra2.0, and given that 
> this version is not even available in debian (and possibly other major linux 
> distros), I'm wondering if it might be better for gpsim's autocrap setup 
> should default to gtk+extra 1.x for now.
>
> In other words, set up the autocrap so './configure' uses gtk+extra1.x,
> while './configure --enable-gtkextra2' uses gtk+extra2.x
>
> Thoughts?

The gtk world is at a cross roads. There are legacy apps that still 
require GTK-1.x, but as time goes on more and more applications are 
transitioning to GTK-2.x. Borut and I decided to transition into the 
future. So the default is the future, and you have to go out of your way 
to dig up the past. But, the real problem is that while gpsim is ready to 
adopt GTK-2.x, gtk-extra is not. And as long as gtk-extra lingers in 
legacy, we'll keep the 'autocrap' lid open...

Scott

Previous by date: 9 Jan 2005 04:11:52 +0000 gpsim configure - should default to gtkextra1?, David McNab
Next by date: 9 Jan 2005 04:11:52 +0000 Re: GTK+Extra2.0 dependency hell, Geoff Horn
Previous in thread: 9 Jan 2005 04:11:52 +0000 gpsim configure - should default to gtkextra1?, David McNab
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.