gnupic: gplink missing symbols


Previous by date: 21 Jan 2005 09:48:57 +0000 Re: 555 code dumper testing (was DIY USB programmer?), Laurence Withers
Next by date: 21 Jan 2005 09:48:57 +0000 Re: gplink missing symbols, Gabor Kiss [Bitman]
Previous in thread: 21 Jan 2005 09:48:57 +0000 Re: gplink missing symbols, Craig Franklin
Next in thread: 21 Jan 2005 09:48:57 +0000 Re: gplink missing symbols, Gabor Kiss [Bitman]

Subject: Re: gplink missing symbols
From: "Vangelis Rokas" ####@####.####
Date: 21 Jan 2005 09:48:57 +0000
Message-Id: <009701c4ff9e$689afd40$47f0673e@Odyssey>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Emerson" ####@####.####
To: "Vangelis Rokas" ####@####.####
Cc: ####@####.####
Subject: Re: gplink missing symbols


>> gplink -m -o out main.o lib1.lib lib2.lib
>> 
>> Suppose that lib1.lib contains the symbol foo1
>> and lib2.lib uses this symbol.
>> 
>> gplink exits with missing symbol error message.
> 
> Other C linkers (including the GNU linker) do exactly the same, so I'm
> not really sure this is really a bug.  Pass the libraries in the other
> order...

What if both libraries depend on symbols defined on the other. In fact
its not so easy to change the module order at will, since I am working
with a compiler, and there is no way to know from the beginning the
symbol dependencies.

regards,
Vangelis



Previous by date: 21 Jan 2005 09:48:57 +0000 Re: 555 code dumper testing (was DIY USB programmer?), Laurence Withers
Next by date: 21 Jan 2005 09:48:57 +0000 Re: gplink missing symbols, Gabor Kiss [Bitman]
Previous in thread: 21 Jan 2005 09:48:57 +0000 Re: gplink missing symbols, Craig Franklin
Next in thread: 21 Jan 2005 09:48:57 +0000 Re: gplink missing symbols, Gabor Kiss [Bitman]


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.