gnupic: Re: [gnupic] best porting interface


Previous by date: 20 Feb 2005 21:37:45 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Can gpasm compile Parallax assembly?, Craig Franklin
Next by date: 20 Feb 2005 21:37:45 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Can gpasm compile Parallax assembly?, Christopher Bergeron
Previous in thread: 20 Feb 2005 21:37:45 +0000 Re: [gnupic] best porting interface, David McNab
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [gnupic] best porting interface
From: estyler ####@####.####
Date: 20 Feb 2005 21:37:45 +0000
Message-Id: <4219032D.4040207@plotinka.ru>

Sorry for unclear terms.
Saying 'porting interface' i mean the API provided by a compiler to 
developers who wants to port Pyastra to other microcontrollers.
By 'best' i mean most efficient and most developer-friendly.

So i'll try to ask it in other words.
Does anyone have experience in porting compilers to any platforms? If 
yes, what do you like or don't like in that comiler's API (that you have 
used to write ports)?

David McNab wrote:

> Sorry, but what do you mean by 'porting interface'?
>
> estyler wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> We are rewriting pyastra and we'd like to find the best porting 
>> interface.
>>
>> Any suggestions, documentations, advices, links, examples, and so on 
>> are welcome!
>>
>

-- 

Best regards,
Alex Ziranov.

Pyastra project: http://pyastra.sourceforge.net/
Rover project: http://www.handhelds.org/projects/rover.html

ICQ: 22365524
Jabber: estyler (at) plotinka (dot) ru
MSN: pyastra (at) hotmail (dot) com


[Content type application/x-pkcs7-signature not shown. Download]

Previous by date: 20 Feb 2005 21:37:45 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Can gpasm compile Parallax assembly?, Craig Franklin
Next by date: 20 Feb 2005 21:37:45 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Can gpasm compile Parallax assembly?, Christopher Bergeron
Previous in thread: 20 Feb 2005 21:37:45 +0000 Re: [gnupic] best porting interface, David McNab
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.