gnupic: Re: [gnupic] gpsim/gpasm assertions


Previous by date: 27 May 2005 08:30:45 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsim/gpasm assertions, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 27 May 2005 08:30:45 +0100 Re: [gnupic] FW: [PIC] PIC development under Linux with Wine, Alex Holden
Previous in thread: 27 May 2005 08:30:45 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsim/gpasm assertions, Scott Dattalo
Next in thread: 27 May 2005 08:30:45 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsim/gpasm assertions, Craig Franklin

Subject: Re: [gnupic] gpsim/gpasm assertions
From: Chris Emerson ####@####.####
Date: 27 May 2005 08:30:45 +0100
Message-Id: <20050527073025.GA25098@ixion.tartarus.org>

On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 08:57:54PM -0500, Craig Franklin wrote:
> Version 4.0 of the COD file spec says this:
> 
> If expression is true (non-zero) then execution halts and a message is 
> printed to standard error containing the following information:
> - name of the source code file containing the triggered assertion
> - source line number of the triggered assertion

In that case I think it'd be less confusing to call them "conditional
breakpoints" rather than assertions.  Alternatively, stick the
expression in a !(...).  :-)

Chris

Previous by date: 27 May 2005 08:30:45 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsim/gpasm assertions, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 27 May 2005 08:30:45 +0100 Re: [gnupic] FW: [PIC] PIC development under Linux with Wine, Alex Holden
Previous in thread: 27 May 2005 08:30:45 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsim/gpasm assertions, Scott Dattalo
Next in thread: 27 May 2005 08:30:45 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsim/gpasm assertions, Craig Franklin


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.