gnupic: Re: [gnupic] gpsim/gpasm assertions


Previous by date: 27 May 2005 20:24:41 +0100 Re: [gnupic] FW: [PIC] PIC development under Linux with Wine, Alex Holden
Next by date: 27 May 2005 20:24:41 +0100 help - DIY PCB manufacture, David McNab
Previous in thread: 27 May 2005 20:24:41 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsim/gpasm assertions, Chris Emerson
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [gnupic] gpsim/gpasm assertions
From: Craig Franklin ####@####.####
Date: 27 May 2005 20:24:41 +0100
Message-Id: <42977462.3080702@users.sourceforge.net>

Chris Emerson wrote:

>On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 08:57:54PM -0500, Craig Franklin wrote:
>  
>
>>Version 4.0 of the COD file spec says this:
>>
>>If expression is true (non-zero) then execution halts and a message is 
>>printed to standard error containing the following information:
>>- name of the source code file containing the triggered assertion
>>- source line number of the triggered assertion
>>    
>>
>
>In that case I think it'd be less confusing to call them "conditional
>breakpoints" rather than assertions.
>
You can take that up with Byte Craft.  It is their spec not mine.

> Alternatively, stick the
>expression in a !(...).  :-)
>
>Chris
>
>  
>


Previous by date: 27 May 2005 20:24:41 +0100 Re: [gnupic] FW: [PIC] PIC development under Linux with Wine, Alex Holden
Next by date: 27 May 2005 20:24:41 +0100 help - DIY PCB manufacture, David McNab
Previous in thread: 27 May 2005 20:24:41 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsim/gpasm assertions, Chris Emerson
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.