gnupic: [gnupic] When/Why did gpal get dropped ?


Previous by date: 30 Jun 2005 02:40:15 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Code segments and the linker, Craig Franklin
Next by date: 30 Jun 2005 02:40:15 +0100 "Make" Magazine story on Open Source PIC tools, Mikey Sklar
Previous in thread: 30 Jun 2005 02:40:15 +0100 Re: [gnupic] When/Why did gpal get dropped ?, Byron A Jeff
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [gnupic] When/Why did gpal get dropped ?
From: Craig Franklin ####@####.####
Date: 30 Jun 2005 02:40:15 +0100
Message-Id: <42C34E44.3000204@users.sourceforge.net>

Byron A Jeff wrote:

>On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 10:20:52AM +0100, Peter Onion wrote:
>  
>
>>I've just realised that gpal was a jal "clone" and that it's disappeared
>>from the latest gputils releases.  When did that happen ?
>>    
>>
>
>gpal wasn't really a clone. Craig certainly had some other ideas.
>
>I saw an announcement on gpal being pushed. But I can seem to locate it.
>
>  
>
>>I assume it was dropped due to lack of interest and/or lack of
>>developers ?
>>    
>>
>
>I think it was lack of support time from Craig. It's probably a hiatus.
>I can appreciate that sentiment. It's one of the reasons that I never
>released my NPCI compiler/interpreter combo. No time to support it.
>
>  
>
>>Had it progressed beyond jal ?  Did it have any sensible bank switching
>>mechanisms ?
>>    
>>
>
>Craig has it listed as pre-alpha. The changelog entry indicates that it'll
>be back when it reaches alpha status.
>
>  
>
Correct.


Previous by date: 30 Jun 2005 02:40:15 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Code segments and the linker, Craig Franklin
Next by date: 30 Jun 2005 02:40:15 +0100 "Make" Magazine story on Open Source PIC tools, Mikey Sklar
Previous in thread: 30 Jun 2005 02:40:15 +0100 Re: [gnupic] When/Why did gpal get dropped ?, Byron A Jeff
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.