gnupic: Re: [gnupic] PIC under Linux developpement Howto


Previous by date: 4 Jul 2005 22:42:58 +0100 Re: [gnupic] PIC under Linux developpement Howto, Sergey A. Dryga
Next by date: 4 Jul 2005 22:42:58 +0100 Re: [gnupic] PIC under Linux developpement Howto, Christopher Bergeron
Previous in thread: 4 Jul 2005 22:42:58 +0100 Re: [gnupic] PIC under Linux developpement Howto, Sergey A. Dryga
Next in thread: 4 Jul 2005 22:42:58 +0100 Re: [gnupic] PIC under Linux developpement Howto, Christopher Bergeron

Subject: RE: [gnupic] PIC under Linux developpement Howto
From: Peter Onion ####@####.####
Date: 4 Jul 2005 22:42:58 +0100
Message-Id: <1120513355.5744.63.camel@HP.RoomLan>

On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 17:23 -0400, Sergey A. Dryga wrote:

> I have to disagree with "one language - a relocatable assembler" option.
> If a newbie is an EE student, that's fine he or she will have to learn
> assembler anyway.  But for a hobbyist, higher level language is much
> easier, or maybe even familiar. 

If they want to use "C" then fine, but they shouldn't be comming to a
"gputils" list for help.

Bearing in mind we probably won't have a huge number of contributors to
this, I think we need to be very focused on what we are trying to
achieve.  Since the focus of this list is "gputils", and since that
doesn't include a C compiler, then I agree with "one language - a
relocatable assembler".

Plus, you really need a detailed understanding of the PIC architecture
to make the best of it's limited facilities, and you aren't going to get
that using "C". 

Peter



Previous by date: 4 Jul 2005 22:42:58 +0100 Re: [gnupic] PIC under Linux developpement Howto, Sergey A. Dryga
Next by date: 4 Jul 2005 22:42:58 +0100 Re: [gnupic] PIC under Linux developpement Howto, Christopher Bergeron
Previous in thread: 4 Jul 2005 22:42:58 +0100 Re: [gnupic] PIC under Linux developpement Howto, Sergey A. Dryga
Next in thread: 4 Jul 2005 22:42:58 +0100 Re: [gnupic] PIC under Linux developpement Howto, Christopher Bergeron


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.