gnupic: Re: [gnupic] gpsim + 12F629


Previous by date: 17 Jul 2005 15:06:15 +0100 Re: [gnupic] KTechlab, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 17 Jul 2005 15:06:15 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Reply-to mangling, Byron A Jeff
Previous in thread: 17 Jul 2005 15:06:15 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsim + 12F629, Nestor A. Marchesini
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [gnupic] gpsim + 12F629
From: "Scott Dattalo" ####@####.####
Date: 17 Jul 2005 15:06:15 +0100
Message-Id: <61699.67.124.110.232.1121609173.squirrel@67.124.110.232>

On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 22:59 -0300, Nestor A. Marchesini wrote:
>
> I am interested in adding support for them p12f6xx, hour I do not
> understand very well
> the structure of gpsim, am reading the class ProcessorConstructor in
> /src/processor.h,
> to my to deal I have to add support for them p12f6xx inside the files:
>
> /src/pic-processor.h
> /src/pic-processor.cc
> /src/p12x.h
> /src/p12x.cc


Nestor,


I'm very sorry that I haven't responded sooner.

You're on the right track for the files that need to be modified. Although
the p12f6xx family really is a 14-bit core disguised as a 12bit one!

Let me add the very basics of for this processor family so that at least
you can fire up gpsim and see the 12f6xx devices there. After that, we can
add the A/D, enhanced timer, and other things.

BTW, I'll post this in another message too, but I've finally completed the
first pass at the I/O pin redesign that I've been wanting to implement for
over a year. With this new redesign, it's not so much of a pain creating a
new processor based on similar (but annoyingly different) ones.

Scott




Previous by date: 17 Jul 2005 15:06:15 +0100 Re: [gnupic] KTechlab, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 17 Jul 2005 15:06:15 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Reply-to mangling, Byron A Jeff
Previous in thread: 17 Jul 2005 15:06:15 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsim + 12F629, Nestor A. Marchesini
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.