gnupic: Re. basic frontend / sdcc


Previous by date: 20 Jul 2005 17:50:49 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Reply-to mangling, Peter Onion
Next by date: 20 Jul 2005 17:50:49 +0100 Re: [gnupic] [gpsim] How to build gpsim for Debian, Chen Xiao Fan
Previous in thread: 20 Jul 2005 17:50:49 +0100 Re. basic frontend / sdcc, easlab.absamail.co.za
Next in thread:

Subject: RE: RE. basic frontend / sdcc
From: ####@####.####
Date: 20 Jul 2005 17:50:49 +0100
Message-Id: <2256.151.81.4.238.1121878241.squirrel@m8-i.net>

You have right, i was interrupted and so i have forgetten to
add the readme file as attachement.

In short, it's a basic type language oriented to C.
This has two reasons. Firstly, the basic compiler produces C
code that must be compiled with a C compiler . Later this should
be automated. Secondly, it's should be a entry language that
is easy to learn between basic (pbasic mikrobasic ..) and C so
the way to the upper language don't should be predetermited.
Having a basic that can access C functions is not so bad.
The third key is portability, it should be easy to port it to
a new processor, so exchanging the pic to a arm, avr or
msp should be simple. If the compiler/frontend is on the first
release, for the user, this switch should be very simple.

[Content type / not shown. Download]

Previous by date: 20 Jul 2005 17:50:49 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Reply-to mangling, Peter Onion
Next by date: 20 Jul 2005 17:50:49 +0100 Re: [gnupic] [gpsim] How to build gpsim for Debian, Chen Xiao Fan
Previous in thread: 20 Jul 2005 17:50:49 +0100 Re. basic frontend / sdcc, easlab.absamail.co.za
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.