gnupic: [gnupic] SDCC developer says gputils are broken...


Previous by date: 28 Jul 2005 04:09:41 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Is sdcc + gputils + gpsim useful ?, Peter Onion
Next by date: 28 Jul 2005 04:09:41 +0100 Re: [gnupic] SDCC developer says gputils are broken..., Peter Onion
Previous in thread: 28 Jul 2005 04:09:41 +0100 Re: [gnupic] SDCC developer says gputils are broken..., Craig Franklin
Next in thread: 28 Jul 2005 04:09:41 +0100 Re: [gnupic] SDCC developer says gputils are broken..., Peter Onion

Subject: RE: [gnupic] SDCC developer says gputils are broken...
From: Chen Xiao Fan ####@####.####
Date: 28 Jul 2005 04:09:41 +0100
Message-Id: <3B8AEFFADD3DD4118F8100508BACEC2C07F773D4@spex>

Some problem with the Exchange mail server. So try it again.
Sorry if one received two copies.

PS: helloled1.c is the modified version (using Peter's fix
of adding "#pragma stack 0x200,64" )of David McNab's sample 
helloled.c used to be at http://www.freenet.org.nz/sdcc.

Regards,
Xiaofan

-----Original Message-----
From: Chen Xiao Fan 
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: [gnupic] SDCC developer says gputils are broken...

Wow, all the problems related to building SDCC 18F examples
went away with the latest CVS. Thanks. I have not looked
at the generated code but it at least builds without any
problems. Still I do not quite understand the warning message
about the processor mismatch regading the crt0i.o. 

Now I can build the programs in the following URL.
http://ubicomp.lancs.ac.uk/~martyn/sdcc_linux/

Regards,
Xiaofan

mcuee@ubuntu:~/Desktop/sdcc/example$  sdcc -mpic16 -p18f252 helloled1.c
Processor: 18f252
helloled1.c:46: warning: setting stack to default size 64 (0x0040)
warning: processor mismatch in
"/usr/local/bin/../share/sdcc/lib/pic16/crt0i.o"
message: using default linker script
"/usr/local/share/gputils/lkr/18f252.lkr"

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Onion 
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 4:50 PM
...
Thanks for fixing this Craig.  

When is the next release of gputils due ? I'm working on a sdcc HowTo so
I'de like to be able to say "use version > x.y.z" of gputils.

Peter

Previous by date: 28 Jul 2005 04:09:41 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Is sdcc + gputils + gpsim useful ?, Peter Onion
Next by date: 28 Jul 2005 04:09:41 +0100 Re: [gnupic] SDCC developer says gputils are broken..., Peter Onion
Previous in thread: 28 Jul 2005 04:09:41 +0100 Re: [gnupic] SDCC developer says gputils are broken..., Craig Franklin
Next in thread: 28 Jul 2005 04:09:41 +0100 Re: [gnupic] SDCC developer says gputils are broken..., Peter Onion


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.