gnupic: Re: [gnupic] 18F, table read, sdcc


Previous by date: 6 Aug 2005 19:14:16 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 18F, table read, sdcc, Alessandro Zummo
Next by date: 6 Aug 2005 19:14:16 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 18F, table read, sdcc, Alessandro Zummo
Previous in thread: 6 Aug 2005 19:14:16 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 18F, table read, sdcc, Alessandro Zummo
Next in thread: 6 Aug 2005 19:14:16 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 18F, table read, sdcc, Alessandro Zummo

Subject: Re: [gnupic] 18F, table read, sdcc
From: Peter Onion ####@####.####
Date: 6 Aug 2005 19:14:16 +0100
Message-Id: <1123352026.5932.18.camel@HP.RoomLan>

On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 19:57 +0200, Alessandro Zummo wrote:

> 
>  Hi Peter,
> 
>   thank you very much for your help: __ code worked just fine!
> 
>  I've also noticed the same result can be obtained by
>  declaring myData as const .
> 
>  Both behaviours seems to be undocumented, or maybe
>  I'm just missing the right doc.

Hmmmmmm I'm not sure if it is in the manual, and I can't remember how I
found out about it !

> 
>  Accessing thru a pointer like tou did in your
>  example is not working though...

Oh.  It works fine here....  I have a count displayed on an LCD
using both methods...

   for(n=0;n<8;n++) printf("%d,",myData[n]);
   for(n=0;n<8;n++) printf("%d,",*myDataPointer++);

I am using a version of sdcc built from CVS though ...
sdcc -v
SDCC : pic16/pic14 2.5.2 #1082 (Aug  5 2005) (UNIX)

Peter


Previous by date: 6 Aug 2005 19:14:16 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 18F, table read, sdcc, Alessandro Zummo
Next by date: 6 Aug 2005 19:14:16 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 18F, table read, sdcc, Alessandro Zummo
Previous in thread: 6 Aug 2005 19:14:16 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 18F, table read, sdcc, Alessandro Zummo
Next in thread: 6 Aug 2005 19:14:16 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 18F, table read, sdcc, Alessandro Zummo


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.