gnupic: Re: [gnupic] code directive question


Previous by date: 9 Sep 2005 16:59:22 +0100 code directive question, Ben Dugan
Next by date: 9 Sep 2005 16:59:22 +0100 Re: [gnupic] code directive question, Ben Dugan
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 9 Sep 2005 16:59:22 +0100 Re: [gnupic] code directive question, Ben Dugan

Subject: Re: [gnupic] code directive question
From: Peter Onion ####@####.####
Date: 9 Sep 2005 16:59:22 +0100
Message-Id: <1126281533.5035.5.camel@ratbert.alien.bt.co.uk>

On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 11:46 -0400, Ben Dugan wrote:
> I thought I'd try to use code directives and make my code relocateable,
> but I have a question.
> 
> If I want interrupt vectors to begin at 0x800 (as they should for
> bootloading purposes in the picdem board), how do I do that?
> 
> Instead of:
> 
> org 0x800
> 
> I can write:
> 
> code 0x800
> 
> But that's not really an improvement, is it?

That's because interrupt vectors ARE NOT relocatable ;)

Try using relocation for some code that can be relocated and you'll
start to see the advantages.

Peter




Previous by date: 9 Sep 2005 16:59:22 +0100 code directive question, Ben Dugan
Next by date: 9 Sep 2005 16:59:22 +0100 Re: [gnupic] code directive question, Ben Dugan
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 9 Sep 2005 16:59:22 +0100 Re: [gnupic] code directive question, Ben Dugan


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.