gnupic: Re: [gnupic] code directive question


Previous by date: 9 Sep 2005 17:04:16 +0100 Re: [gnupic] code directive question, Peter Onion
Next by date: 9 Sep 2005 17:04:16 +0100 Breadboard question (gpsim), wayne
Previous in thread: 9 Sep 2005 17:04:16 +0100 Re: [gnupic] code directive question, Peter Onion
Next in thread: 9 Sep 2005 17:04:16 +0100 Re: [gnupic] code directive question, Peter Onion

Subject: Re: [gnupic] code directive question
From: Ben Dugan ####@####.####
Date: 9 Sep 2005 17:04:16 +0100
Message-Id: <4321B277.4000907@curdes.com>

> That's because interrupt vectors ARE NOT relocatable ;)
> 
> Try using relocation for some code that can be relocated and you'll
> start to see the advantages.


Yes, I understand that.  But I thought one advantage would be that I 
could write the program in such a way that I could move it, say, from a 
picdem board (with its linker script) to some other board or chip 
architecture (with a different linker script) and just changing the 
linker script would relocate things correctly.




Previous by date: 9 Sep 2005 17:04:16 +0100 Re: [gnupic] code directive question, Peter Onion
Next by date: 9 Sep 2005 17:04:16 +0100 Breadboard question (gpsim), wayne
Previous in thread: 9 Sep 2005 17:04:16 +0100 Re: [gnupic] code directive question, Peter Onion
Next in thread: 9 Sep 2005 17:04:16 +0100 Re: [gnupic] code directive question, Peter Onion


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.