gnupic: Re: [gnupic] xwisp2 1.7.01 released
Subject:
Re: [gnupic] xwisp2 1.7.01 released
From:
Rob Hamerling ####@####.####
Date:
17 Sep 2005 08:20:50 +0100
Message-Id: <432BC3CD.7010302@hccnet.nl>
Hi Wayne,
Wayne Topa wrote:
> You forgot the Makefile and ISTR you were going to put the
> xwisp2.cfg file in the source package, XWISP2171S.ZIP.
Huh? Have you downloaded the right package? I just checked again:
(1)
There are 6 makefiles in xwisp2171s.zip called 'xwisp2_pq.mak', in which
'p' represents the compiler (g-GCC, v = IBM-VAC, w = Watcom) and 'q'
represents the target platform (2 = OS/2, w = W32, u = linUx'). So for
compiling xwisp2 under linux you'll probably use xwisp2_gu.mak.
(2)
xwisp2.cfg is also in xwisp2171s.zip....
[from you other message]
> I copied the xwisp2.cfg from the binary zip file. The changes.txt
> file mentions the 'fix for the 12F635,683, and the 16F684,688 etc'
> as removing the FuseFixedZero and FuseFixedOne specifications from
> xwisp2.cfg. xwlistu still has them listed tho.
Probably a misunderstanding: I removed only the part of the calibration
words. The masks for the config word (fuses) itself should remain.
Note, xwisp2 uses these mask only to prevent write/verify errors when
the hex-file contains an incorrect bit pattern. For example: the hex
file contains for the fuses a '1'-bit on an 'unused' position which
always reads back as '0'-bit.
To Xiaofan: with verify-only xwisp will report errors in your hex-file
to my opinion rightly: the hex file is in error, not the bits in the PIC.
> The XWISP2171.ZIP, binary package, does indeed work as advertised!
>
> Very nice job Rob. You sure did the fixup fast. Now I really have
> to consider the Wisp6[2|4]8 again.
Thanks for the compliments!
Regards, Rob.
--
Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL phone +31-347-322822
homepage: http://www.robh.nl/
