gnupic: [gnupic] Different hex file generated by gpasm and mpasm


Previous by date: 20 Sep 2005 11:20:57 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Different hex file generated by gpasm and mpasm, Rob Hamerling
Next by date: 20 Sep 2005 11:20:57 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Different hex file generated by gpasm and mpasm, Chen Xiao Fan
Previous in thread: 20 Sep 2005 11:20:57 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Different hex file generated by gpasm and mpasm, Rob Hamerling
Next in thread: 20 Sep 2005 11:20:57 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Different hex file generated by gpasm and mpasm, Chen Xiao Fan

Subject: Re: [gnupic] Different hex file generated by gpasm and mpasm
From: Martyn Welch ####@####.####
Date: 20 Sep 2005 11:20:57 +0100
Message-Id: <200509201120.53244.welchm@comp.lancs.ac.uk>

----- Original Message ----------
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 11:07, Rob Hamerling wrote:

> An assembler is not a compiler! With an assembler there is a one-to-one
> relationship between a source statement and a machine instruction. A
> compiler must translate the high level symbolic language to a machine
> instructions and it has much freedom how it wants to reach the goal.
>

Which is a very good point :-)

Next time I'll wake up before replying.

> 1. Not a fair comparison with assembler!

WRT above - yup (whoops!)

> 2. The second example will give compilation errors!   ;-)

Again, coffee required.

Martyn

-- 
Martyn Welch ####@####.####

PGP Key : http://ubicomp.lancs.ac.uk/~martyn/pgpkey.html

[Content type application/pgp-signature not shown. Download]

Previous by date: 20 Sep 2005 11:20:57 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Different hex file generated by gpasm and mpasm, Rob Hamerling
Next by date: 20 Sep 2005 11:20:57 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Different hex file generated by gpasm and mpasm, Chen Xiao Fan
Previous in thread: 20 Sep 2005 11:20:57 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Different hex file generated by gpasm and mpasm, Rob Hamerling
Next in thread: 20 Sep 2005 11:20:57 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Different hex file generated by gpasm and mpasm, Chen Xiao Fan


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.