gnupic: Re: [gnupic] gpsim compliation problems - gtkextra-2.0


Previous by date: 5 Oct 2005 08:30:20 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsim compliation problems - gtkextra-2.0, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 5 Oct 2005 08:30:20 +0100 gpsimWin32 empty processor list?, Barrie Slaymaker
Previous in thread: 5 Oct 2005 08:30:20 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsim compliation problems - gtkextra-2.0, Scott Dattalo
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [gnupic] gpsim compliation problems - gtkextra-2.0
From: Peter Chant ####@####.####
Date: 5 Oct 2005 08:30:20 +0100
Message-Id: <200510050830.12536.pete@petezilla.co.uk>

On Wednesday 05 October 2005 03:27, Scott Dattalo wrote:

>
> Now you're running up against the compatibility issue with the
> Officially released gtkextra and the unofficially released version. The
> 0.21.4 version of gpsim does not compile properly with the officially
> release version of gtkextra (because it wasn't available at the time
> that gpsim-0.21.4 was released)

Probally due to me trying both gtkextra from the gpsim site and when that 
did not work trying it from gtkextra's site.

>
> My advice to you is to either a) wait a short while before I release the
> next version of gpsim (probably less than 24 hours from the time stamp
> of this message), b) use the unofficially released version of gtkextra
> (from gpsim's web page), or c) check gpsim out from CVS.

a) A sounds good.

Thanks for your efforts.

Pete

Previous by date: 5 Oct 2005 08:30:20 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsim compliation problems - gtkextra-2.0, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 5 Oct 2005 08:30:20 +0100 gpsimWin32 empty processor list?, Barrie Slaymaker
Previous in thread: 5 Oct 2005 08:30:20 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsim compliation problems - gtkextra-2.0, Scott Dattalo
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.