gnupic: Re: [gnupic] making xwisp2 more UNIX compliant


Previous by date: 26 Oct 2005 18:29:31 +0100 Re: [gnupic] making xwisp2 more UNIX compliant, Easy B
Next by date: 26 Oct 2005 18:29:31 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Ktechlab: only PIC16F84 listed, David Saxton
Previous in thread: 26 Oct 2005 18:29:31 +0100 Re: [gnupic] making xwisp2 more UNIX compliant, Easy B
Next in thread: 26 Oct 2005 18:29:31 +0100 Re: [gnupic] making xwisp2 more UNIX compliant, Marco Pantaleoni

Subject: Re: [gnupic] making xwisp2 more UNIX compliant
From: Marco Pantaleoni ####@####.####
Date: 26 Oct 2005 18:29:31 +0100
Message-Id: <200510261929.01433.panta@elasticworld.org>

On Wednesday 26 October 2005 19:14, Easy B wrote:
> Ok. Thanx for the effort.
> But why do you create all these directories you don't need? We only
> need bin and share. And I would prefer if you'd copy the xwisp2

Ah, those come from a more or less standard makefile template that I use.
I'll remove unneeded directories (but they are standard anyway in /usr 
and /usr/local).

> binary as xwisp2 and not xwisp2u. There's no need for the u, we only
> need a unix binary here. And you also forgot xwlist, it's a binary
> too. I like the Linux style archive. It took a while when I had to
> install zip on my debian box...

The "u" comes from the original makefile, upon which I've based my 
modifications. I'll rename it to "xwisp2" and fix the missing file.

Ciao,
Marco

-- 
Marco Pantaleoni

elastiC language developer
http://www.elasticworld.org

[Content type application/pgp-signature not shown. Download]

Previous by date: 26 Oct 2005 18:29:31 +0100 Re: [gnupic] making xwisp2 more UNIX compliant, Easy B
Next by date: 26 Oct 2005 18:29:31 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Ktechlab: only PIC16F84 listed, David Saxton
Previous in thread: 26 Oct 2005 18:29:31 +0100 Re: [gnupic] making xwisp2 more UNIX compliant, Easy B
Next in thread: 26 Oct 2005 18:29:31 +0100 Re: [gnupic] making xwisp2 more UNIX compliant, Marco Pantaleoni


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.