gnupic: Re: [gnupic] SDCC PIC14 and gplink: _gptrput4 problem


Previous by date: 16 Nov 2005 01:22:52 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Possible gpasm or gplink bug?, Chen Xiao Fan
Next by date: 16 Nov 2005 01:22:52 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Possible gpasm or gplink bug?, Craig Franklin
Previous in thread:
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [gnupic] SDCC PIC14 and gplink: _gptrput4 problem
From: Craig Franklin ####@####.####
Date: 16 Nov 2005 01:22:52 +0000
Message-Id: <437A8A01.1040202@users.sourceforge.net>

Vaclav Peroutka wrote:

> Hi Raphael (and others),
>
>> ------------ Puvodni zprava ------------
>> Od: Raphael Neider <RNeider@>
>>
>> Could you update your gputils and try again?
>
>
> I today downloaded gputils-0.13.3 beta ( that one on sf.net) and 
> compiled it almost successfully. Now I get warning "Processor 
> mismatch". So it looks the problem is in gputils and not SDCC. Should 
> I recompile something ?
>
> Output follows:
> c:\V\programovani\Pic\STA3005-JTAG-enable>sdcc -V -mpic14 -pp16f627 
> jtagenb.c
> Processor: p16f627
> + C:\PROGRA~1\SDCC\bin\sdcpp.exe -nostdinc -Wall -std=c99 -DSDCC=1 
> -DSDCC_MODEL_
> SMALL -DSDCC_pic14 -D__pic14 -I"C:\Program 
> Files\SDCC\bin\..\include\pic14" -I"C
> :\Program Files\SDCC\bin\..\include"  "jtagenb.c"
> + C:\PROGRA~1\gputils\bin\gpasm.exe -c "jtagenb.asm"
> + C:\PROGRA~1\gputils\bin\gplink.exe -I"C:\Program 
> Files\SDCC\bin\..\lib"  -I"C:
> \Program Files\SDCC\bin\..\lib\pic"   -o jtagenb jtagenb.o   libsdcc.lib
> message: using default linker script "C:\Program 
> Files\gputils\lkr\16f627.lkr"
> warning: processor mismatch in "_gptrput4.o"
>

You have to add a "-w" to the command line to disable the warning.

> Thanks,
> Vaclav
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
>


Previous by date: 16 Nov 2005 01:22:52 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Possible gpasm or gplink bug?, Chen Xiao Fan
Next by date: 16 Nov 2005 01:22:52 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Possible gpasm or gplink bug?, Craig Franklin
Previous in thread:
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.