gnupic: Re: [gnupic] building problem with Ktechlab on FC4
Subject:
Re: [gnupic] building problem with Ktechlab on FC4
From:
David Saxton ####@####.####
Date:
18 Dec 2005 17:49:33 +0000
Message-Id: <200512181749.16931.david@bluehaze.org>
On Sunday 18 December 2005 15:02, Scott Dattalo wrote:
> > Ah, ktechlab-0.2 doesn't compile with gpsim-0.21.11.
>
> David,
>
> I wouldn't mind helping resolve that problem. However, I can't build
> ktechlab either.
svn version supports gpsim-0.21.11 (although I should probably test against
your 0.21.12 snapshot if you're releasing that soon).
As ktechlab 0.3 should be released soon (hopefully within a week), there's no
need to do anything with 0.2.
Still though, there's a minor thing you might be able to resolve - is there an
equivalent function in 0.21.11 to the load_symbol_file(Processor **, const
char *) in 0.21.4? The closest one I've found is
PicCodProgramFileType::LoadProgramFile(Processor **pProcessor, const char
*pFilename, FILE *pFile).
>
> I checked the code out of svn and ran
>
> $ ./configure --prefix=$(kde-config --prefix) --enable-debug=full
>
> and got this error:
>
> checking for rpath... yes
> checking for KDE... libraries /usr/lib, headers /usr/include/kde
> checking if UIC has KDE plugins available... no
> configure: error: you need to install kdelibs first.
>
> However, I *do* have kdelibs installed:
>
> $ rpm -q kdelibs
> kdelibs-3.3.0-5
>
> I'm using FC3-64bit.
>
> Any ideas on what may be the problem?
>
Do you also have the kdelibs-devel package installed?
Google can probably help much more than I can, as that error message seems
pretty common.
