gnupic: gpasm-0.9.0


Previous by date: 7 Feb 2001 21:15:04 -0000 Re: Pic 16f84 progamming..., Andy N1YEW
Next by date: 7 Feb 2001 21:15:04 -0000 Re: gpasm-0.9.0, Craig Franklin
Previous in thread: 7 Feb 2001 21:15:04 -0000 Re: gpasm-0.9.0, Scott Dattalo
Next in thread: 7 Feb 2001 21:15:04 -0000 Re: gpasm-0.9.0, Craig Franklin

Subject: RE: gpasm-0.9.0
From: "Nestor A. Marchesini" ####@####.####
Date: 7 Feb 2001 21:15:04 -0000
Message-Id: <007101c0914c$03cd44a0$e6382fc8@nothing>

Scott

Before all..congratulations for hacking over gpasm and gpsim
the question is....the correct syntax of ERRORLEVEL
I'am assembling a code with gpasm 0.9.0 and obtain the warning number 226
I see that the gpasm.pdf documentation is very old and not include this
warning
Where can I find new documentations to gpasm and gpsim.
I have gpasm.pdf  007 2 1998      and     gpsim.pdf   Dec 24 1999

               00060   RADIX                 HEX
Warning receptor.asm 61 : 226 All codes must be proceeded by '.'
Example: -.203
               00061   ERRORLEVEL            0, -.302, -.306
               00062   PROCESSOR             16F84
;16F84A-04/P
gretings :)
NĂ©stor.

----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Dattalo ####@####.####
To: ####@####.####
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 1:32 AM
Subject: gpasm-0.9.0


>
> Again, thanks to Craig Franklin, gpasm has taken another quantum leap
forward:
>
> http://www.dattalo.com/gnupic/gpasm-0.9.0.tar.gz
>
> There haven't been too many changes since 0.8.16. However, Craig is about
to
> embark on the next stage of gpasm development. His last few patches have
been
> fairly significant and warrant a jump in the upgrade number.
>
> The next task Craig is currently hacking away on is linker support for
> gpasm. Yippie! Now this isn't going to be any ol' linker support. Craig is
> striving to maintain mplink compatibility. This will require some reverse
> engineering of the (mostly COFF) mplink object files.
>
> Craig has also written a hex disassebler whose output can be fed back into
gpasm
> to generate the same .hex code. It should keep those recursive programmers
busy
> :). This utility will eventually be integrated into the gpasm source tree.
>
> The vc (.cod file viewer) utility is going to get integrated into the tree
as
> well.
>
> Scott
>
> PS. I'm slowly plugging away on the SDCC PIC port. The pcode design and
> implementation is proving challenging (for every three lines of code I
write, it
> seems like I delete two!).




Previous by date: 7 Feb 2001 21:15:04 -0000 Re: Pic 16f84 progamming..., Andy N1YEW
Next by date: 7 Feb 2001 21:15:04 -0000 Re: gpasm-0.9.0, Craig Franklin
Previous in thread: 7 Feb 2001 21:15:04 -0000 Re: gpasm-0.9.0, Scott Dattalo
Next in thread: 7 Feb 2001 21:15:04 -0000 Re: gpasm-0.9.0, Craig Franklin


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.