gnupic: Re: [gnupic] gplink throws away configuration (PIC18F458)


Previous by date: 19 Dec 2005 21:03:05 +0000 Re: [gnupic] How simputer COULD HAVE succeeded ?, James Newtons Massmind
Next by date: 19 Dec 2005 21:03:05 +0000 Re: [gnupic] gplink throws away configuration (PIC18F458), Craig Franklin
Previous in thread: 19 Dec 2005 21:03:05 +0000 Re: [gnupic] gplink throws away configuration (PIC18F458), Craig Franklin
Next in thread: 19 Dec 2005 21:03:05 +0000 Re: [gnupic] gplink throws away configuration (PIC18F458), Craig Franklin

Subject: Re: [gnupic] gplink throws away configuration (PIC18F458)
From: Craig Franklin ####@####.####
Date: 19 Dec 2005 21:03:05 +0000
Message-Id: <43A7208D.4030400@users.sourceforge.net>

Craig Franklin wrote:

> Chen Xiao Fan wrote:
>
>>  
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ian Jackson Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 8:57 PM
>>>   
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>>> As you can see from the complete transcript below:
>>>  gpasm -p18f458 -c test.asm  gpasm -p18f458 -c config.asm  gplink 
>>> test.o config.o produces an a.hex file which doesn't conttain the 
>>> configuration.
>>> gpvo config.o suggests that the config.o is right.  Using gpasm in
>>> absolute mode like this works:
>>>  gpasm -p18f458 test.asm  gpasm -p18f458 config.asm  ./merge-hex 
>>> test.hex config.hex >merged.hex
>>>   
>>
>>
>> This seems to be a bug with gplink. MPASM/MPLINK
>> (tested with MPLAB 7.22) are okay with the code.
>>
>> If I combine the two asm file manually, both gpasm
>> and MPASM produce the same code.
>>
>>  
>>
>
> It is not a gplink bug.  It is a gpasm bug.  If you view config.o, the 
> section size is 0 bytes.  So gplink doesn't include the section in the 
> output.  This only happens if the .config section is the last section 
> in the file.  If you put a dummy section after the config, the output 
> will be correct.  I will fix gpasm.  Give me a couple hours.
>
Fixed in cvs and the snapshot.  Please test it and let me know.  I will 
release it.

>> Regards,
>> Xiaofan
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
>> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
>


Previous by date: 19 Dec 2005 21:03:05 +0000 Re: [gnupic] How simputer COULD HAVE succeeded ?, James Newtons Massmind
Next by date: 19 Dec 2005 21:03:05 +0000 Re: [gnupic] gplink throws away configuration (PIC18F458), Craig Franklin
Previous in thread: 19 Dec 2005 21:03:05 +0000 Re: [gnupic] gplink throws away configuration (PIC18F458), Craig Franklin
Next in thread: 19 Dec 2005 21:03:05 +0000 Re: [gnupic] gplink throws away configuration (PIC18F458), Craig Franklin


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.