gnupic: Re: [gnupic] Re: [PATCH] CONFIG feature progress


Previous by date: 23 Jan 2006 04:34:27 +0000 Re: [gnupic] need pic18fxxx programmer!!, Chen Xiao Fan
Next by date: 23 Jan 2006 04:34:27 +0000 Re: [gnupic] [PATCH] code_pack / gpvo newer object file support, Chen Xiao Fan
Previous in thread: 23 Jan 2006 04:34:27 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Re: [PATCH] CONFIG feature progress, Xiaofan Chen
Next in thread: 23 Jan 2006 04:34:27 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Re: [PATCH] CONFIG feature progress, Michael Ballbach

Subject: RE: [gnupic] Re: [PATCH] CONFIG feature progress
From: "Chen Xiao Fan" ####@####.####
Date: 23 Jan 2006 04:34:27 +0000
Message-Id: <7D4AB72251D4D949AB2732ABEABDA54F12FFE4@PFSG-MX1.ap.p-f.biz>

> From: Michael Ballbach
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 3:35 AM
> To: ####@####.####
> Subject: [gnupic] Re: [PATCH] CONFIG feature progress

>  2) Instead of using 0xff where there are holes in the section, 
>  I use 0x00, since a device burned with MPLAB seems to read 0x00 
>  in the holes during a table read. This is instead of just omitting 
>  them altogether from the HEX file, since this is somewhat difficult 
>  to do.

Today I read the README for MPLAB C18 V3.01 and I have some concerns
about this. I will try to install V3.01 and see what will happen.

From MPLAB C18 V3.01 README file:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
3. What's Been Fixed in This Release
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(27358 / 27515) The #pragma config directive causes unimplemented bits
        to become 0, but should be left a '1'.
        Unimplemented/reserve bits are now included in the mask and
        default settings when the bit must be maintained set.

If I understand this correctly, the unimplemented bits should be 
left as "1".

Regards,
Xiaofan

Previous by date: 23 Jan 2006 04:34:27 +0000 Re: [gnupic] need pic18fxxx programmer!!, Chen Xiao Fan
Next by date: 23 Jan 2006 04:34:27 +0000 Re: [gnupic] [PATCH] code_pack / gpvo newer object file support, Chen Xiao Fan
Previous in thread: 23 Jan 2006 04:34:27 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Re: [PATCH] CONFIG feature progress, Xiaofan Chen
Next in thread: 23 Jan 2006 04:34:27 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Re: [PATCH] CONFIG feature progress, Michael Ballbach


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.