gnupic: Re: [gnupic] WISP628 programmer layout design?


Previous by date: 5 Feb 2006 22:47:16 +0000 Re: [gnupic] WISP628 programmer layout design?, Jay Dagenais
Next by date: 5 Feb 2006 22:47:16 +0000 Re: [gnupic] WISP628 programmer layout design?, Martin Klingensmith
Previous in thread: 5 Feb 2006 22:47:16 +0000 Re: [gnupic] WISP628 programmer layout design?, Jay Dagenais
Next in thread: 5 Feb 2006 22:47:16 +0000 Re: [gnupic] WISP628 programmer layout design?, Martin Klingensmith

Subject: Re: [gnupic] WISP628 programmer layout design?
From: John Nall ####@####.####
Date: 5 Feb 2006 22:47:16 +0000
Message-Id: <43E68010.8020302@gmail.com>

Jay Dagenais wrote:
> > Mostly because I want to takkle the experience and aolso because I 
> am in Canada and just don't like to wait, like you said yourself, very 
> easy to build- but to the beginner, even the easy things are not so 
> straightforward, such as the questions I posted regarding the design 
> schematic. Thanks! jaydag71

OK, whatever.    However, I can absolutely, 100% assure you that 
breadboarding it from a schematic is going to be harder than building 
from a kit, by an order of magnitude!  :-)  I'm not sure what being in 
Canada has to do with it, but in the past ordering stuff from voti.nl 
has been easier and quicker (for me, anyway) than ordering from within 
the US (where I am).  On the other hand, though, I will admit that you 
will learn more from breadboarding it, so there are tradeoffs.

At any rate, best of luck.  I have had my Wisp628 for several years now, 
and am really pleased with it. 

John



Previous by date: 5 Feb 2006 22:47:16 +0000 Re: [gnupic] WISP628 programmer layout design?, Jay Dagenais
Next by date: 5 Feb 2006 22:47:16 +0000 Re: [gnupic] WISP628 programmer layout design?, Martin Klingensmith
Previous in thread: 5 Feb 2006 22:47:16 +0000 Re: [gnupic] WISP628 programmer layout design?, Jay Dagenais
Next in thread: 5 Feb 2006 22:47:16 +0000 Re: [gnupic] WISP628 programmer layout design?, Martin Klingensmith


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.