gnupic: Re: [gnupic] cvs updates


Previous by date: 11 Mar 2006 18:02:11 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Alex Holden
Next by date: 11 Mar 2006 18:02:11 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, bill sack
Previous in thread: 11 Mar 2006 18:02:11 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 11 Mar 2006 18:02:11 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, bill sack

Subject: Re: [gnupic] cvs updates
From: "Scott Dattalo" ####@####.####
Date: 11 Mar 2006 18:02:11 +0000
Message-Id: <60834.71.139.29.197.1142099758.squirrel@71.139.29.197>

> On 11 Mar 2006, at 17:32, John De Villiers wrote:
>> any reason why anonymous would get rejected on cvs for gpsim and
>> gputils
>> ?  sourceforge gone haywire again ?
>
> Anoncvs access to Sourceforge seems to be broken most of the time in
> my experience. CVS over ssh usually works, but only if you're a
> registered developer on the project you want to access.

SF recently announced support for SubVersion. Does anyone know if those
servers are more reliable? If so, should we consider moving over? I know
one benefit is that there's no 3 or 4 hour delay between the developer
repository and the public repository.

Scott

Previous by date: 11 Mar 2006 18:02:11 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Alex Holden
Next by date: 11 Mar 2006 18:02:11 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, bill sack
Previous in thread: 11 Mar 2006 18:02:11 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 11 Mar 2006 18:02:11 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, bill sack


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.