gnupic: Re: [gnupic] cvs updates


Previous by date: 11 Mar 2006 18:07:59 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 11 Mar 2006 18:07:59 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Jeff
Previous in thread: 11 Mar 2006 18:07:59 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Scott Dattalo
Next in thread: 11 Mar 2006 18:07:59 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Jeff

Subject: Re: [gnupic] cvs updates
From: bill sack ####@####.####
Date: 11 Mar 2006 18:07:59 +0000
Message-Id: <4413121D.1090601@buffalo.edu>

i humbly suggest nightly snapshots of cvs as tarballs somewhere (for us 
non-developers who just wnat to stay on top of the freshest version)?

Scott Dattalo wrote:

>>On 11 Mar 2006, at 17:32, John De Villiers wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>any reason why anonymous would get rejected on cvs for gpsim and
>>>gputils
>>>?  sourceforge gone haywire again ?
>>>      
>>>
>>Anoncvs access to Sourceforge seems to be broken most of the time in
>>my experience. CVS over ssh usually works, but only if you're a
>>registered developer on the project you want to access.
>>    
>>
>
>SF recently announced support for SubVersion. Does anyone know if those
>servers are more reliable? If so, should we consider moving over? I know
>one benefit is that there's no 3 or 4 hour delay between the developer
>repository and the public repository.
>
>Scott
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
>For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
>
>
>  
>


Previous by date: 11 Mar 2006 18:07:59 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 11 Mar 2006 18:07:59 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Jeff
Previous in thread: 11 Mar 2006 18:07:59 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Scott Dattalo
Next in thread: 11 Mar 2006 18:07:59 +0000 Re: [gnupic] cvs updates, Jeff


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.